What is the different between the simple Nokia with N class and E class? I used to use 9500, it's good for me but when I used for long time it's seem too big and heavy.
I have good experience in the old communicators , if NOKIA will keep insisting on the small screen and No touch , I would realy advice you to buy other brand
I mate is more comfortable and the price is more reasonable .
But to be fare the camera if I-mate is not that much ,
anticipated to be a great min business tool but seriously they would have included a touch screen to make it more user friendly and fast.
it would be good if virgin took this and added dab tele/radio hardware to it,,wat fone it would be
good design early awaiting its release sure its a welcome on the 9500 and 9300 series
Its color can be black. Battery standby and talk time capacity should be more than 400hr and 10hr respectively.
Nokia should only announce their phones when that model is actually available for sale. The delay from announcement to actual availability is ridiculous.
Initially I thought this column could enlighten fellows E90 enthusiasts. But what we get here is sucks here and sucks there.
While we are in E90 comments box, please stick to E90 alone. Comments should be WHAT NOKIA SHOULD AND SHOULDN'T HAVE INCORPORATED IN THIS PHONE.
If you guys need to compare, please do your own comparisons in the respective column.
There are hundreds of phone models out there. Each is designed for everyone of you. So just choose the right phone for the applications best known to you and stop sucks here and sucks there.
We are more interested in constructive comments as to how Nokia could improve their next generation phone. If you don't like this phone, so be it. To those who have the money, just buy and live with it. After all its your prerogative..
Anyone know if this phone supports A2DP? I have the E60 and hate the fact that it doesn't.
Also, any idea on the GPS chipset that it uses? And are the maps loaded onto the memory or are the downloaded OTA?
nobody hasn't properly used the phone yet. saying it SUCKS and windows mobile are better, you MUST be playing too much. E90 promises something better but it needs to perform yet. stop whining!
........finally an answer to the rhetorical question of the century
( who ate all the pies )
....The Nokia E90 ate all the pies.lol.
But seriously, just buy the 5700 unless ur one of those business type people things
1000 Euro? !!!!! Wow!
I think this worth about 500-600 Euro.
- It is too big
- Screen is small and not practical, can not look at documents, NET, pictures, video etc. The ratio of the screen is different than anything else.
- No touch screen : You can't take quick notes (which if you ever tried great)
Slow to navigate.
Eten, HTC, Samsung products much more user oriented, slim with more and better features for the same or less money.
This unit 5-7 years late!!!
moto and samsung have put a lot of money into getting all its electronics sllimmed without bad compromise to batt and superior inards..Nokia never wanted to do clamshells they were pushed into it by consumers..WHat im saying is nokia need to stop banging out any old thing and invest in shrinking the series 60 platform..texas instrument did it for windows and by shrinking the platform they doubled the procceesor speed and doubled the battery life overnight ( texas instruments omap 750)..
You will loose bet as you can't run chm files while on laptop you can :D
I had same problem (still do) on my E60. Nevertheless, E90 seems as ultimate phone which should make me happy for next 3-4 years.
I recently expanded my E60 with LD-3W so I won't rush to get E90 as I need 3rd party applications to support internal GPS devices too.
stick to what was the phone intended for. playing games, touchscreens and other non-sense features aren't its strenght. if you want to play get those crappy windows mobile.