This phone looks better than the lumia 710, but the specs are bad and no clearblack display as well, the lumia 710 is just a little more expensive than this phone. But it's worth the extra money, but I wish the lumia 710 would have looked better, it's plastic body looks very cheap
Micro SIM only
Only 800 Mhz processor
No memory card
All the limitations of WP
Heavy 130 g
Ugly toyish look as always from Nokia...
And they think they will sell them, what a joke.
Seems like a phone from a few years ago.
meet, 07 Apr 2012better then androidFor android i think its not enough, but for windows its just right.
Sam, 11 Apr 2012get your stats homie. Ace is just nearly the same and gives you better screen and interface. a... moretotally wrong.
don't even start with the screen. this phone's display in bigger and has wvga resolution which is far more superior than the ace's grainy hvga resolution. and you even thought about lumia offering HD videos. ace offers vga videos only
AnonD-5160, 16 Apr 2012i hope its 256k..GsmA might have erred..56k doesnt make any sense..Btw how big a difference it... morehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJIdOLOHeQE&feature=related
sam, 15 Apr 201256 k colours hahahaha its 2004i hope its 256k..GsmA might have erred..56k doesnt make any sense..Btw how big a difference it gona make?Any idea anybody?
Obviously there is something wrong.. a 56k display is not in the reckoning.. I'm pretty sure that gsmarena got it wrong..
Try it with your own hand then compare with other ,, you'll know which is better one,,,
don't be so WTH with just an argument
lol!Is it true that the specification which was TFT Capacitive Touchscreen with 16M Colors for this phone is changed now to support only 56K colors.
If yes!Than Nokia wake up - India market is changing rapidly