This could have been a great starter phone if it wasn't for that 512mb RAM. I see it has been stripped off sensors and extras - no LED, no gyro, no compass. That is OK. How come you put a Gorilla Glass 3 and a quad-core processor but you decide you will cut some expenses with the 512mb of RAM? I can't honestly understand how the entry class Lumia is only one step away from the flagship Lumia. Everything between 525 and 930 is a waste of parts and isn't justified as a price. Who in his right mind is going to spend another 100-150 EUR on a LED?
no front cam
if 520 updated to 8.1 i think much better, no need to buy lumia 630 almost same specs.
one small Pre WP 8.1 Update received.... just Go Download it......after This Small Update..you`ll be able to Download WP 8.1 for "Preview for Developer" program users
Nokia 620 from 2013 :
480 x 800 pixels, 3.8 inches ~246 ppi pixel density
5 MP, 2592 x 1936 pixels, autofocus, LED flash
Secondary Front Camera VGA
512MB RAM, 8 GB storage
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4
CPU Dual-core 1 GHz Krait
GPU Adreno 305
Nokia 630 new for 2014:
480 x 854 pixels, 4.5 inches ~218 ppi LOWER pixel density
5 MP, 2592 х 1944 pixels, autofocus, NO FLASH
Secondary NO FRONT CAMERA
512MB RAM, 8 GB storage
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400
CPU Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7
GPU Adreno 305
Before, in 2013 there was a difference between choosing the 620 to the 520.
Now in 2014 the 630 is basically the same phone as the 525 ??!?!?!
And you pay how much for people to come up with these stupid ideas NOKIA?
Are you making fun of consumers?
games like subway surfer, tepmle run and fifa would run properly or not ??
Anonymous, 11 Apr 2014630Lumia 720 have 6 mp Camera with Flash, front camera and bigger battery.
Sure 512MB of RAM is not a problem, WP is much more efficient than android, but I don't really get why they removed the flash and front camera from the 625 to make the 630/635 while also reducing screen size and video size (the 625 shoots 1080p). The only excuse I can think of is that these will sell for $150, because there's nothing to make them cost more than the 625 even if the number makes it look like an upgrade.
Anonymous, 11 Apr 2014which is better? lumia 625. 630. 720.... Go for Nokia Lumia 720.
in this era no front camera and flash nokia atleast add frontcamera and rest of features are good.
SHOOVRO, 11 Apr 2014The configuration says, this phone is gonna be another loss project for Nokia, because, no fla... moreBut this would be sure replacement for 520. There is proximity senser. Dont mind d haters. Even 512mb is more than enough on wp8.1. Anyway am not a gamer.
nokia has to add some feauters like 1gb ram,flash and front camera....it will be rock..
The configuration says, this phone is gonna be another loss project for Nokia, because, no flash for rear camera, no front camera, lack of sensors, insufficient ram 512 only, undoubtedly not good enough to run many apps at a time, so with all deficiencies, very few would be interested on this phone.
No flash? That's very disappointing. I believe with flash, this phone will be a BOMB.
512MB ram with Quadcore 1.2ghz cpu and WP 8.1 on board will be able to play games previously requiring 1gb ram with dual core on WP8. Wishfull thinking...Hope not.
You all r requested not to compare lumia with 512MB to an android with 1GB. Go to any nearest NOKIA CARE centre and get a LIVE DEMO of Lumia with 512MB RAM and U will feel like as if it has 1 GB RAM. WP with 512MB RAM works more smoothly than of ANDROID with 1GB RAM. Because this OS has unique Architecture u will Feel this. I Accept Some games like TR2, and subway Surfer work on 1GB RAM on WP but the optimization work is still in process and soon u will be able to play these games on 512MB RAM WP Devices Too... :)
AnonD-240798, 10 Apr 2014Yup I agree but u want dis specs than its prise sounds near 13000 They don't give front camera and 1 gb ram. Ok bro No problem. But If somebody paying 10k for smart phone at least Flash should be there.........We Indians use flash in nights mostly :)