Has MS and nokia really gone mad !! what the hell they are doing ?? :@:@ only the primary camera that also without flash and secondary camera..
their product is purchased for sake of camera and what they are doing ??
though its less ram and no lag can be understood..
this is generation of 4g and they are giving us " phone that has no secondary camera " !!!!!!!
AnonD-267429, 26 May 2014right but although 512MB is good for windows phone, 1GB is always better, do u agree?even though it has 512mb ram it does not hang much compared to andriods ..
RavenAii, 23 May 2014No they're not stupid. Even though the 635 only has 512Mb ram but the WP OS optimises the ram ... moreright but although 512MB is good for windows phone, 1GB is always better, do u agree?
bismatobing, 19 May 2014RAM 512 ?? compare to galaxy young star has RAM 756
stupid enough for NOKIANo they're not stupid. Even though the 635 only has 512Mb ram but the WP OS optimises the ram usage so that the phone could operate big application with less or even no lagg.
Samsung with Android OS did different approach to 'hide' the hang problem. They increase the amount of ram which is a bit weird as the Galaxy S4 with 2Gb ram still laggs quite often under heavy usage.
Apple's previous iPhone 4 with iOS also has optimised 512Mb ram and I never heard someone said that it hangs or even a person said that iPhone is stupid enough to put small ram on it's product.
bismatobing, 19 May 2014RAM 512 ?? compare to galaxy young star has RAM 756 stupid enough for NOKIAat least it is optimize unlike Samsung it's quite laggy
RAM 512 ?? compare to galaxy young star has RAM 756
stupid enough for NOKIA
1. Windows spent 30% of their budget on optimizing WP 8.1 with 512mb. It becomes so efficent that it will run what 1Gb would be normally. Thats why they still do low end 512mb phones. The OS runs fine. iPhone has a similar ethos, the only reason android fill it with specs is because it's not optimised for a specific phone so performance varies so much.
2. Although the numbering system has gotten quite confusing with Nokia, this is NOT a replacement for the L625. This is a replacement for the 520. The level of specs is almost identical and it will be max £150 in the Uk. Not much more than what the 520 was except this phone is quad core and 4G.
Nokia are clearly attacking two ends of the market first, low end and top end. (635 and 930). They will bring more models for inbetween, replacing the 820 and 625 with other models.
lumia phones doesn't need a lot of ram like android to play big game 512 can easily operate big games
no front camera no problem, no flash camera it's ok, but 512 RAM.. are you kidding me ?
lumia 635 Nokia brasil 4G LTE latinoamerica
gaurav, 15 May 2014Nokia is still producing crap mobile .... Window 8.1 is lagging in 512 mb ram model and again... moreWindow 8.1 is lagging in 512 mb ram means you are using the preview for developers 8.1 so wait until the official 8.1 releases to give your comment on the lagging.
Nokia is still producing crap mobile ....
Window 8.1 is lagging in 512 mb ram model and again Nokia come with these two mobile
I will blame his engineer for all this ,,,
4G LTE and without front camera?.. Gorilla Glass 3 available in 630 also with less price, 3G it self useless without front camera in both 630 and 635. Better go for 625 with better camera, display and battery. Only you have to sacrifice with Gorilla Glass2, however that will be a better option than any other for smart beginning.
Windows phone going to behind.
No Front Cam
What u thing Nokia & MS
First u put basic features.
Lack of Front camera and Ram should be 1 gb..... Otherwise its a good phone in this price range....