Anonymous, 04 Apr 2014Nokia is thinking now not in 2014 technology.It is having 2004 ideas.waste phone.now a days oc... moreHellow Anonymous
Every one know this is 2014, but you should know every ones are not billionaires in the world, in sri lanka most around 60% of people monthly income is $100- $200. as you said if nokia puts all these features in all the models definitely $800- $1000 per unit like sam S5, iPhone5s. do you think only billionaires use smart phone, others don't,
all the people wanted to enjoy the new technology with according to their financial condition.
best proof is nokia's recent 525&520 are 10time more sold out in short period than 1020&920.
bcoz its a budget phone, pls understand most people are in the world is pure.
Don't buy those limited phones,i have l620 and it can't play even temple run 2 or subway surfers beacuse of 512mb.All new apps and games on windows phone system need 1 gb ram ,so don't be fooled by microsoft.
Nokia camera does not need a flash to take a pic. Low-light picture is good on Nokia
Nokia, am a great fan of you. Nokia is giving best hardware specs in all models except in the case of camera. surely this lumia 635 will be priced aboove 14 k. see the model is not providing secondary camera and flash and this model is only powered with 512 mb outdated ram comparing to 525 (Rs. 9800) itself. the phone has both 3g and 4g network support, we know that this is mainly for video conferencing. But without secondary camera how this is possible..?
and without flash, what will be the quality of the picture at night and low light places.?
so this two are just importanct facts and nokia should provide this anyway. otherwise please deduce the price tag for this type of models.
Hope Nokia will fullfill our needs. :)
no flash and no front camera, its cool because i dont give a rat's behind on those. Hell, u can take the back camera too. These features are for nerds, btw, if u need flash so bad go get a real camera. But the 512 ram, kinda low, and u increased the screen size but u made low ppi. Those are the real downsides
Nokia is thinking now not in 2014 technology.It is having 2004 ideas.waste phone.now a days octacore processor Qualcomm snapdragon 801 CPU lineup companies are intex,karbonn,micromax,gionee,xiaomi.where is Nokia in this range.
annu7, 03 Apr 2014whts the difference between 630 and 635635 HSDPA, 42.2 Mbps; HSUPA, 5.76 Mbps; LTE, Cat3, 50 Mbps UL, 100 Mbps DL
630 HSDPA, 21 Mbps; HSUPA, 5.76 Mbps
Anonymous, 03 Apr 2014I think l625 better it h big screen , front cam , main cam with flash , n same 4g same ram same cpu.I like it its better than 625 but front cam and flash could make it best selling in this price tag
annu7, 03 Apr 2014whts the difference between 630 and 635The Lumia 630 in 3G single SIM and the first Lumia with 3G Dual SIM. Lumia 635 is single sim with 4G/LTE.
I think l625 better it h big screen , front cam , main cam with flash , n same 4g same ram same cpu.
no flash, no front facing cam, 512mb ram, low ppi,but still it is a good phone maybe not great. So stop complaining, considering it's price.
do you really need a flash or you just don't know how to take photos? study and read about photography and you'll know what I'm talking about, ok? =) cheers!
I find this disappointing because I was developing interest for WP. Is it to replace the Lumia 5xx series or what? Its a step backward. Lumia 620 had a front facing camera this has neither that or a flash. Plus i find the pixel density on the 720 (217ppi)very annoying as its not sharp and one can see the pixels, compared to the 620 (246ppi). This new phone is just as bad as the 720.. smh
Where do we place this exactly?
Another failure, no flash, 512MB of RAM, screen resolution is better suited for screens of 4-4.3 inches. I've expected little bit better phone than lumia 520/525/625, at least camera flash.
This phone and lumia 630 is just another low budget phone, all that i want is lumia with middle budget and at least 1GB RAM, because lately they released just high budget and low budget, no mid :( please