Nokia Lumia 635 - user opinions and reviews

• Anonymous
• PWa
• 03 Apr 2014

I think l625 better it h big screen , front cam , main cam with flash , n same 4g same ram same cpu.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-229038
• rAP
• 03 Apr 2014

whts the difference between 630 and 635

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• g
• uvY
• 03 Apr 2014

bad phone no front facing camra

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• irfan
• uts
• 03 Apr 2014

its seems that nokia is running out o RAM chips!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• asmid
• tue
• 03 Apr 2014

no flash, no front facing cam, 512mb ram, low ppi,but still it is a good phone maybe not great. So stop complaining, considering it's price.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• Kcv
• 03 Apr 2014

do you really need a flash or you just don't know how to take photos? study and read about photography and you'll know what I'm talking about, ok? =) cheers!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-250658
• Nw%
• 03 Apr 2014

I find this disappointing because I was developing interest for WP. Is it to replace the Lumia 5xx series or what? Its a step backward. Lumia 620 had a front facing camera this has neither that or a flash. Plus i find the pixel density on the 720 (217ppi)very annoying as its not sharp and one can see the pixels, compared to the 620 (246ppi). This new phone is just as bad as the 720.. smh

Where do we place this exactly?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• m1s
• 03 Apr 2014

Another failure, no flash, 512MB of RAM, screen resolution is better suited for screens of 4-4.3 inches. I've expected little bit better phone than lumia 520/525/625, at least camera flash.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Rey
• P@9
• 03 Apr 2014

This phone and lumia 630 is just another low budget phone, all that i want is lumia with middle budget and at least 1GB RAM, because lately they released just high budget and low budget, no mid :( please

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Yogi
• NL9
• 03 Apr 2014

1 GB RAM, flash wth 2K+ price wud've done gr8.

This is non-sense.
i dnt see ny reason y wont i go for 520/525 then these 2 entiques !

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-242321
• 6cH
• 03 Apr 2014

This device targets lower end market. If this is priced at $150, or heck even lower, this will give a very tight competition to the what's called the 'Best budget phone of 2013', the Moto G. People should stop whining about front facing camera (only useful for video calls. Other than that, useless) and it's 512 MB RAM, because windows is more efficient. 512 MB can be equivalent to 1 GB in android.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• RV
• vGm
• 03 Apr 2014

Another failure device from MS & NOKIA. Lumia 520, 525, 630, 635...

No Flash
No Front Cam
Still 512 MB RAM...

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 6P}
• 03 Apr 2014

512 mb RAM and no front facing camera! WTH????

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• XXX
• 2mx
• 03 Apr 2014

mohan, 03 Apr 2014those who say it lacks front cam and flash..it is a budget phone kepp that in mind before comm... moreThey are not shitty devices. They actually understood the customers. Also see about Moto G all bigger things comes in small packages. Thats y nokia lost its market. But still they are not changing.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-226291
• rJ9
• 03 Apr 2014

-_- its price is between 110-150 euros

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• a0k
• 03 Apr 2014

512 mb ram!?...

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-174476
• rKj
• 03 Apr 2014

What u r doing Nokia guys,still 512 mb ram! On upcoming Phones like 630& this...

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• sando
• uu2
• 03 Apr 2014

sando need this mobile...sando wants it

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• atul
• 9xf
• 03 Apr 2014

this is best to go go

• Rating1 |
• Reply
• Report

• vny
• vGB
• 03 Apr 2014

No front cam-OK,
No Flash-OK,
Ram 512mb Seriously ?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report