I am not satisfied. Secondary camera is nil. Only internel memory. Whats phone yaaar.......
torcida, 11 Dec 2011whats wrong with you guys!? nokia should rather stay with symbian than change to the boring an... moreSymbian had too many limitations, mainly in screen resolution and supports only ARM11 and older processors, very serious limitations.
Android is too unstable and WP7 is too restricted, just like iphone. So whats the options? MeeGo doesnt even have flash in the browser, and RIM is not an option at all.
We just have to choose the lesser of the evils, and Android is the winner. To get a stable good os that can do anything the onli option is N900, its too old and slow. Nokia would have been the number one smartfone today if they had continued the development of Maemo, by far the best ever mobile OS because it was a full OS! Full real linux, one of a kind, we will never see such a great device again, ever.
Btw, the missing flash support in browser is problem of both meego and WP, so its a general limitation of Nokia these days. Very serious lack of common functionality required in 2010, and now we already have 2012 soon. Someone send mtr Elop a calendar so he also can see what year it is.
i hate it. It's os is windows not symbain. Support other extention files that's this good quality.
No secondary camera so you can't do vedio call
i just wondered if anyone was lucky enough to buy this phone from argos the other day at only £119,yep you seen rights guys, only £119,by time i had seen it they was out of stock and the next day when they had more in stock they was at the correct price of £440
cutter, 10 Dec 2011not a complete phone.........
1)- No secondary camera
2)- No memory slot
yes, thats right...
so why you dont get an N9!?
You can buy it with 64gb and it has a frontcam... In addition it has a revolutionary UI!!
hardik, 11 Dec 2011nokia have to adopt android os .sym is poor now this all feature also have in android os but... morewhats wrong with you guys!? nokia should rather stay with symbian than change to the boring android!!
I have a Lumia 800 as my secondary phone and only one thing disappoints me with it:
The abysmal sound quality. I carry an iPhone 4S as my primary phone, and the difference in sound quality is like night and day.
The lack of apps doesn't bother me. Good twitter clients are available, as are other apps I need.
The Windows Phone interface is original, and actually very logical and simple to use. I personally prefer iOS but WP7 would be my second choice. The camera is good, and as I never do video calling with my phone, the lack of a front facing camera doesn't matter.
The battery life is nowhere near what Nokia claim, but will last a day. It'll do.
Hardware wise, it is durable, stylish and even the packaging is appealing.
All in all, it's not bad.
deepesh, 10 Dec 2011no one is asking u to buy it.so if u dont like it.,.stay away from here please.this forum is f... moresharing viewes is not an issues, we should allow people to express their observations and this helps for deciding factor
nokia have to adopt android os .sym is poor now
this all feature also have in android os but at low cost
i m tired with nokia symbain
android is great
I think it not a exlent mobile. It is beter to buy n8.lumia is failure model
Nokia's symbian phones are way better hardwarewise
They have bluetooth v3 instead of v2.1 in lumia.
Have secondary cam.
External memory slot expandable to 32gb.
No memory slot in lumia,Thats a serious mistake.Whats wrong with people at nokia.
16gb no memory slot that's not a problem, but without the front camera is very unfortunate.
1450 Juice is not enough for this phone. Looks Nokia never beat its competitors.
Saw this phone yasterday, and this definately another phone users will repent after shelling there money, with a small screen nokia cannot earn and ignore competetion offered by samsung and htc, getting a phone with just similar prices of high end phones wont shine these guys, almost every phone is resting in nokia service station for repare.