[deleted post]The more is the pixel value of the front camera, the more internet speed you need to make a Video call. If the front camera is a VGA then you can make video call even with an EDGE speed. If it is 3.2MP, u need a broadband connection. Wake up. at the end of day performance matters not the specs.
AnonD-34145, 01 Mar 2012why nokia not make ANDOID PH plzz atles make 1 ph witch work android file or flash player spor... moreWhat extra can an Andriod do than Nokia's Belly? Ofcourse, this is a Windows. I love Belly Os.
chand, 29 Feb 2012Once again Nokia produced a Bla (Giant) product. There is no comparison of it with iPhone 4/4S... more20% Windows, 30% iOS and 50% Andriod?????? Dude go and check the records.... Where is Symbian and BB Os in ur list? u mean to say none use them???
Andriod is the most unstable OS i have ever seen. How much fast it came into the market, it is going to get out with the same speed.
[deleted post]Wake up Buddy, Front camera is to make video calls. If it is a VGA, the data consumption is less during video call. if they give a 3.2MP camera in front, it needs a high speed broadband connection to make a video call.
Skype App Comes To Windows Phone..beta verison for windows series man
why nokia not make ANDOID PH plzz atles make 1 ph witch work android file or flash player sported plzz nokia make ph
if there is no skype video chat in this model it will not be a success. there is no java also
Once again Nokia produced a Bla (Giant) product. There is no comparison of it with iPhone 4/4S.
But in my point of view, Nokia can crash the market, become the leader and capture more than 60% market shares if
=> Nokia provide Android (like HTC and other companies) or similar OS with this set instead of Windows. Today, around 20% use Windows phone, 30% using iPhone and rest of 50% using Android.
=> Nokia provide Dual Boot with Windows and Android.
this is meant to be a heigh end device what a joke, after all even iOS has dual core phone i dont quite see nokia going forward with windows. Quite simply i think that they should have either improve Symbian (which would have been expensive and ineffective as a company) or embrace MeeGo something that in my eyes looked really good and i even considered getting a handset running the os, although i've disliked nokia for its existence.
don't cry for dual core! you can compare the performance of WP and Android OS for Which one is smoother with same spec. May be some android fan boys are stuck in swamp of Force close.
May be they haven't use WP and yell bla bla bla. Wake up android fan boys, time to jump for some new experience with WP. We want Quality, Not Quantity as android fan boys OS(ICS still plan to update and why jelly bean) mwahaahaa
Its meant to be a flagship and it doesnt have a dual core processor or 1080p video. Nokia you've let us down
I have been waiting for the internation version of this device ever since CES and was hoping for just a little bit more. Am an Android fan and user who was getting frustrated with Android and tempted by the sleek Windows Phone experience. Now with the HD screens that Android is unleashing, multi-cores and theoretically excellent imaging capabilities, I may just stay with Android.
Since my upgrade is a couple of months away, I will of course wait for the actual review and to try out the Lumia 900 which I also think is good on paper, but already looking dated in light of the unstoppable Android army!
So is this going to support win8, or it wont like the rest of the Lumia?
Cause if it wont, its worthless, just wait a bit more for the win8 enabled ones.
The phone is really awesome! It has all the essential qualities that too with Windows OS. Also, its the first piece from Nokia with a Gyro sensor.
browsing is a WOW!
anyways, it would take years for network brands all over the world to reach that speed.