great features good design but the performance will be decided after use but from nokia expected to be great but with a $250 (if correct) i think there is something not perfect for this mobile the price should be more than $500
I hope the specs are true and it has lens protector and kickback stand as seen on Nokia N86. Hopefully it has DUAL LEDs
Dave Jones, 25 Mar 2010I bought this phone a few days ago for $250 it's ok but the camera quality is a little poor.yes, I remember I sold you it!
I bought this phone a few days ago for $250 it's ok but the camera quality is a little poor.
why rate something I haven't had a chance to physically see or use? looks like it will be a great phone though.
Nice to see Nokia finally catching up to the likes of Samsung and LG in terms of hardware. However, as far as I'm concerned, the handset will sink or swim depending on the quality of Symbian S^3. I do hope that it does well though, I really want to see Nokia continue the success they had with the N900.
o.m.g i can't believe my eyes.
finally its here "the nokia's warrior"
i cant w8 to buy this phone
How bout you all stop even bothering commenting on a phone that may not even come out. Stress less :P
@)--, 24 Mar 2010nokia.. always no.1..Samsung was the 1st to release 12mp camera phone then SE & Nokia has'nt even released this just rumoured. So SAMSUNG #1
what is the point of voting for this phone anyway.
this will get you nowhere. get a life.
but im voting 0 0 0 !
crappy design, lack of innovation.
and it has the nokia logo on it.
thumbs up. . . its an0ther c0ol ph0ne that anyone will wait 4 it. but this could much better if it is a windows phone. . .
Nice phone for advanced users and the like.
Not for the normal everyday idiot, though.
Anonymous, 23 Mar 2010Do you have access to the prototype, if you don't then you can't say it doesn't have a feature.do you have the access yourself? can you read the specs in this website?