WHO CARES WHAT CAM IS BETTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
N90 and N91 r both great fones as well as w800 and K750
Yeh but go to SE forums and you would see Nokia fans dissing SE hardcore and i kow you all here do not do it but i do not think its fair...i wouldnt be surprised if an SE fan started doing it!
But Rune I thought the same thing as you (but the other way round) and the K750i camera was better to me, so sometimes the reviews can help but it's best to experiment yourself
I thought the camera in SE K750 was better until I tried it out with a friend of mine (I have a N90). The N90 is actually better. Do not always believe the reviews, take them as an guideline but do not trust them blindly.
Please explain what you mean with the statement "K750 is more valuable"
Hey man! I think you just didn't read my message carefully, So do it first and then here is my reasons:
1. I tried not to be fanatic even if I am a SE fan, because at that time I had a SE Z200 that is one of the weakest phones of SE and I had a lot of problems with that, however I got a K750 just 3-4 hrs ago! and I posted this message now just to resolve a misunderstanding.(I hope it works)
2.In fisrt page of this forum I traced 22 "K750" versus no "N90" in the first page of K750 opinions.
3.I never said that K750 or SE is better than N90 or Nokia (however I believe that, but I said K750 is more valuable.
4. I agree that N90 has some advantages to K750 (3G, Symbian, EDGE and bigger display), but at the same time it got disadvantages (very low mem. no vibration,much lower battery life, being nearly 2 times heavier and even lower camera quality due to evaluation in just this site) that seemed to me unreasonable specially for a phone with a price of 2.5 times of K750.
Finally I read the messages of various forums to learn something and come to a judgement and I did so and despite your view I think criticizing and discussing over a subject is more useful than than applausing and lauding behind the closed doors. (maybe you can teach me something about democracy because I'm coming from a country that there in nothing of it in! :)
Listen if u got the money buy it if not then buy a 1100
N90 is too Big
Only 128 MB card ( comes with it ) ( mine did )
Bad Battary life
not nice to hold when on the phone camara is in way ( my personal remark )
sound recorder only 1 min
REALLY BAD HEADPHONES
s60 software ( i already got software and games on it ) ( oh and Cards and Snooker game coems free with this phone )
lovely mp3 queilty
So its up to u if u want it i wanted it and i got it and its best nokia i ever had only 1 thing i miss is the IR i use to turn off peoples Tvs with it ha ha ha
after all no phones are perfect... like duffy girl.. she says that she prefer motorola regardless how good N90 is. But, she make out the good point there.. N90 is very easy to be apart, its too fragile...
I know ppl that N90 have many good options and its perfect but you should noitce something it is easily broken!! it can easily be broked Espically the camera ofcourse. Besides i like small phones with good cam and ave Bluetooth and Real tones,Mp3 and i found all of this in e530 I know its not that perfect but its cool and cute
TO RUNE:I don't see any phone as a threat,I'm happy with my v800 and I know that in the near future better phone will come up.I'm interested in mobile phones in general and that is why I'm writting about n90(and also about other phones)
I used to be a great fun of Nokia,but Nokia put me down.The last Nokia I had bought was 6210.Bugs with the phonebook and problems with the signal.My previus Nokia,7110,which some people say that it was superb,had very serius problems with the software and the updates didn't help.Sure,it was superb phone,but only in papers,in fact the phone didn't work.Sience then,I have never met a phone with so many bugs.That is why I hate Nokia...
probably that is one good reason why you see less bashing for N90 in K750 forum (They used nokia just before K750, which means they just started to be SE fans, they probably still speak for favour for nokia to some extent... so they don't go and bash them that harshly.. in this forum here its mostly the SE fans for a quite a while
Oh, I've seen in a site that it has very low Jbenchmark3d and Jbenchmark 2 scores
*sincere apologies for 2 posts
If SE fans post in N90 forum saying that K750 and W800 are better, it can be only because they're interested, in some way, in this amazing Nokia phone and they are afraid that it's better (and it is) than their new SE.
N90 fans are not interested in K750 or W800 as they don't post that K750 is crap in its own forum and they are not jealous of it.
The truth is that this phone is the first competitive Nokia model in terms of features.
6630: finally a UMTS nokia phone, but no videocall...
6680: quite near to other brands, but nothing above average and boring design.
N90 here's a phone with above average features and if a clamshell nokia can be rarely seen (as quite all nokias are bar shaped) this one which is also Symbian and 3G is really exclusive!
If you want to post about how K750 is the best phone ever you should do it in SE K750 section, so that the other SE fans could say "yeah, that's it, everything else is crap" and so on... and N90 fans could finally discuss in peace about their favourite phone.
lolxx... so many ppl complaining that this phone is soooo expensive and put it to the negative sides.. i dun understand why ppl says that K750 is a cheap-priced phone and keep bashing them and says that it sux because it is cheap?????
what do you expect for a mobile phone price guys? you so funny!!! you don't want it to be expensive yet if it is cheap you will bash them lolxxx
This phone is huge and heavy. I don't understand what's so good about this phone.
It comes with those awful, awful standard nokia headphones, so I wouldnt consider it a good mp3 player (and I dont like buying extra accessories other than memory cards/sync docks) ..
Oh and did I mention it's big and bulky?
The best mobile ever. Symbian OS plus 3G. The only minus is the price and weight
I forgot to say that I'm not a K750 user, but I'm searching the reviews to decide what to buy. (and I'm geting assured that K750 is the most optimized phone to buy)
To Rune & others:
First: I saw the word N90 in K750 forum far less than K750 in this forum, that shows on the contrary, N90 fans Do care about K750 more than contrariwise (I hope you forgive my weak english!)
Second: terms like "cheap" & "expensive" are proportional, personaly I prefer to use the term "optimized" to describe the real value of things. Accordingly the 1000$ N90 has far less value than 400$ K750.
Third: You're partially right about price comparision, SE has no handset over 500$, but let's see which Nokia phone can compete with K750 (ofcourse in price!)?...
Maybe you don't like that, but it is (in best conditions) 8800 or 7280!! It may be not pleasant, but please go & check out them!
Finally I didn't know that The Fabulous N90 with Carl Zeiss lense! has no vibration & accepts only 64MB !! ;)
@ Previous Nokia fans:
You like to go to the disco?
Buy N91 which has vibration, good camera, huge memory for Mp3 storage.
It can browse web and run Symbian applications while K750 can't.
Personally I hate the disco, I don't need vibration so much, I'd like to have Symbian s60 and I like shooting videos.
For those reasons I like N90 more than k750, which has vibration but lacks 3g, Symbian, video capability, web browsing and high resolution screen.
You can compare in this way also 3310 to N90
-longer standby time
But N90 fans will answer
-a hundred features more!