i kind agree with observer i have seen lots of pics of the n90 they never looked overexpo, as they were here, and some even looked better than the k750i, plus with the n90 you dont have to set anything, i imagine he spent alot of time setting the camera of the w800 to take those pics =P with nokia's was a breeze
some more N90 pictures - ( this is an original source, the previous was just a copy):
how can you compare N90 and k750
k750 is just a plain phone while N90 is a SMARTPHONE and this is what makes the difference (and if U do not see/appreciate the difference between plain phone and a smartphone I wonder what are you doing here on a mobile fans site)
If U want to see some pictures taken with N90 go there:
there is huge difference between pictures on GSM Arena and those, I have no idea why
The W800 camera may be better but this phone, but the N90 is a smartphone. It is richer in functionality so this is why it is more expensive. You people who like the W800 for it's camera are talking rubbish if you think that phone beats the N90. The N90 has far better video, symbian OS, a far better screen and it has 3G. I'm sorry but those people who the camera is everything need to get their facts right. Don't say the W800 is the best just because of photo quality. Remember Sony Ericsson also has the worst reliability record as Nokia is joint best with Samsung, and for those idiots who anger me every time I read the reviews saying this phone hasn't got vibration, THE PHONE HAS GOT VIBRATION!!! Why can't you people understand that. My friends got a Sony Ericsson phone and even he agrees compared to a Nokia series 60 smartphone Sony Ericsson's operating system loses every time. People have also been dissapointed with the N90 because it doesn't have an FM Radio. IT'S A 3G PHONE!!! which means you can get the FM Radio using the Internet so if you get a 3G contract you can use the Radio for free. This phone is not a loser. It is the phone with the most functions on the market today and in my eyes Sony Ericsson should be jealouse of Nokia for making this model, but no Sony Ericsson would rather design models just for selling in their millions. It started with the T610 and their latest addition is the W800. Why do they keep on designing products with good camera's but never back it up with anything else. People have called the W800 a music phone but all you get is a 512mb memory stick instead of a hard-drive. To me it sounds like they have cheated. However though the phone is still worthy of being put in the top models today becasue of the camera and music capabilities so I suppose if people don't have the money to buy the N90 they can get a W800 or K750. The only thing I have to congradulate Sony Ericsson on is the prices of their handsets.
after all the drama and delay, ironically the SE W800 beat this N90 hands down on photo quality.
Nokia, better start connecting people again.
no no no, it ain't unfare, the quality of w800's pictures r way better than n90's. i always was and am a nokia fan but in this case SE rulz the world of pictures :)
Oh thought your might be interested in this
Shortage reported for Nokia N90
Nokia Corp. is seeing shortages of its much-promoted N90 camera phone because of strong initial demand, reports the WSJ.
"The Nokia N90 features a digital camera with a lens from manufacturer Carl Zeiss.
The product went on sale world-wide July 20. The N90 is the first in a series of handsets designed to reinvigorate Nokia's product range at the top end of the market."
Woohoo bought the phone already after a long wait, I was gonna blow off if it did not make it this month. Purchased at Sg.Wang (KL Malaysia) for RM3.2k (USD850) on the first day (7th August) of release. Not many stores had it yet, only few authorised Nokia sellers did, thus they were selling at the price range of RM3.2k-RM3.6k(USD850-USD950). For Maxis (Msian Telcos) promotion (RM3088) the stocks are not available just yet, gotta be end of the month for pre-order and early Sept for market availability. Anyway nice phone with superb features! Whoever has got it out there, have fun with it guys!
Anyone has this phone yet? Is the photo quality the same as in the review? Thanks in advance for ur info.
i have been nokia user for 7 years n i used most of nokia products but sony ericsson change it all n really like their s700i,k750i n w800i n nokia n90 looks like another flop nokia 6260 n i like nokia but no style in them look at nokia fashion phone n all rubbish n expensive but trade value is low n hope nokia stop producing stupid phone n their battery power really sucks n sony ericsson rocks n connecting to sony ericsson
have u guys written the new "camera test" btwn n90 and sony e w800
this phone is a loser....
im in england and i really like the phone i just have one more question about it how long does the phone video record
i bought the n90 today n it was a amazing phone... it took me so long to decide whther should i get this phone.. i have no regrets... the features r so cool although it was a bit pricey than others... but i really think is worth it. the photos were great looking n the videos were taken very smooth.. i have to say this phone is meant for men only...
This phone was priced at $1,088 with no plan. But useless and not value for money, after reading the comment on camera test.
K750 is definately better than this HUGH phone; especially considering it's size.
Camera of the K750 is definately MUCH, MUCH better.....who care who make the camera lens when the outcome is poor quality !!
There are quite a few professional review on the web. READ THEM !!
An amazing phone. Selling out already. No phone in the world touches this technologically.
High resloution screen outperforming nearly every mobile, game, dvd device.
Excellent camera with many configurable camera modes.
First use of a glass lense for mobile camera from Carl Zeiss.
Series 60 UI. Most versatile and advanced OS in a phone. You can do anything using this phone.
3G, Edge and 2G compatible.
Lots of software for music, games, business and email/internet.
Removable memory. RSMMC and SD which are cheap.
The only minuses are that because its 3G its hard to make small and light like when 6630 came out. Glass lense adds weight and no vibration. But these are minor setbacks.
I dont think comparison to k750 is valid. The only thing K750 has that is similar is the camera. Everything else about the K750 is several years behind the n90. I recommend the Nokia 6280 and 6270 as alternatives to K750i as they are similar and mid range phones. Not even the N70 is worth comparing to k750. Nseries are high end and you can do more than you will ever imagine on them compared to any standard mobile like the K750, 6280, 6270, D600, Moto 3G phones etc. K750 doesnt even have Edge/2.5G
im from england the phones supposed to be out this mounth and im really exicted but all these opinions are saying its bad its good i dont know but can someone who has the phone tell me if its to big or heavey if the features such as realplayer and games are good and last of all is the carmera and video recording good plz i need to know if its worth buyin