For SEF: This phone will sel mostly for it's video recorder: 640x480/30 fps. And about the photo quality..there is no big diference betwin them..exept if u are an expert photographer. My opinion: u can not compare these phones..N93 is WAY OVER K800 and I'm not a nokia fan..I quite hate Nokia..
Sory 4 my bad english..
this phone it's too less for the price almost $1000, with that huge size I rather buy, separate digicam and ipod and a cell phone. unless for people that think, size, weight, and high price means good stuff, this is a right phone. and WiFi ?? you already far away from the hot spot, by the time it's done loading the web page. is it a smart phone ?? be smart before buying it, it ain't cheap.
eh, u all can see when the picture are been taken and by with model.. http://www.sotovik.ru/catalog/reviews/sonyericsson_k800i-4-rev.html
that what tarantula want. now open ur eyes bigger. k800 just can take better picture in the dark????? so all k800 user must live in the dark world to show all nokia fan that they have a better camera phone... hahaha!!!!
To all SE fan especially TARANTULA, look clearly in this sites: http://www.sotovik.ru/catalog/reviews/SonyEricsson_K800i-4-rev.html
Tq to Ruslan_12. N93 is all better. Not only still photo, but surely VIDEO!! Best phone 2006!
actually u can't accept that finally, nokia can make better camera than SE!
I am stupid?? you dont know what is EXIF in a picture, and you call me stupid.
And in your phantom review pics are in VGA, the pics are in VGA!!! or not?. they can say that it weight 900Kb but IN THE PAGE IT DISPLAYED in VGA and no more... no link to download the original photo, nothing. where is 3MP?? what kind of review is this??? This pics havent EXIF, or maybe i cant find that??
If you dont get the information of pics you dont know what camera take this, if the pic is manipulated or it isnt, the page can say a lot of things but with EXIF you can view the origin of the pics, model of camera, manufacturer, shutter speed, ISO mode and other information. now, Who is the stupid??
In a camera review it been at maximum resolution... Are these pics at maximum resolution??? Why do you say wich is better... and in VGA resolution... Poor... really poor.
Ask for a EXIF meaning, maybe a friend know what is it, or search at internet.
You cant call me stupid if you dont know this basic concept... really you are the stupid
Or, i say to you how you can view this information: download the photo to you PC, go with right button of your mouse, click in properties, go to resume label and click in advanced options. The images that were adultered or modificated only show the resolution, original pics show all information. It is easy or it isnt??.
You can do that with GSM arena pics, later with the great pics of your great review.
You will see that dont say anything.
Please, when you write something do with education, not all people are in your level of ignorance, not all people have your small brain
Comparison between SE K800i, Sharp 903SH, Nokia N80 and Nokia N93. Review is said that Nokia N93 makes better pictures then K800i.
But in the dark SE800i(using flash) is the best phone in this comparison.
(just click on photos for full size)
hey guys, i would be very thankful if someone could help me out.
all i had o ask was that
+ can a newer firmware fix trhe problem
+ can a firmware be downloaded for free from nokia.com
Hahahahaha, in mobile-review both phones (K800/N93) have beta firmware, GSM Arena review is with final firmware, thats the diference between reviews.
In your phantom review (http://www.mml.com.tw/topicdetail.php?f=192&t=81440)
How i know if these pics are of the mentioned phones??????
Theres no EXIF information!!!, i dont know its it really been taken with K800, N93 or Sharp 903. They put anything but if i dont know whats is the origin of these pics, maybe it been adulterated, Who knows?. And the worst thing, pics are only in VGA!!! Who buy a 3,2MP phone and uses it at VGA resolution!!! its incredible!!! how do you say wich one is better at this resolution?!?!?!?!! I really see minimum difference between them
In GSM arena/Mobile-review review´s you can view EXIF information, you can view easy wich one is of that phone... Its hilarious
N93, Tq for ur suggestion to check that website. I know Nokia N93 is better from K800 since saw the comparison made by eldar. But SE fan feel that their fone is better after see the sample in this sites review. I think in all other site we can see N93 is better. But I can't go to the page u gave. I can see the picture in this add: http://www.mml.com.tw/newsdetail.php?id=1370
Something better than N93,K800,Sharp 903 :
Direct comparison between:
3. Sharp 903 SH
Where is the low pic quality of the N93 shown by gsmarena?
In most pics K800 is under both N93 and Sharp.
To all those SE fans, look what N93 can do if it is properly used with the right firmware.
the pictures taken by K800 in the review are cool !!
SE are better in camera but Nokia wins in everything instead camera pictures !!!
Nokia is like the ipod,every other company tries so hard to make something better but in the end the ipod allways wins.LONG LIVE NOKIA
i think the k800i is way better than the nokia the cybershot is a camera so still pictures are amazing theres no arguement se outdid nokia deal with it....
i'm suprised nokia does so well. There phones are crap just admit it.