Nokia X - user opinions and reviews
- NAJEM
- tUd
nice
- AnonD-242608
- vGu
not more than 7.5k dude.. watch for lenovo 369i and micomax a63 and sony xperia e.. exept micromax a63 others does not have front camera but same features but price is between 6.5k to 7k. i am using micromax a63, only pros is battery back up. nokia people are just sleeping. they hasnt read indian people. where others are miles ahead in that. i thought this will be under 8k. learn from samsung and micromax who are making good phones with affordable price. this phone is combination of lumia 520 with android.
- nokia rockxxx
- U@Q
ex-user nokia, 09 Mar 2014Finally nokia use android...i still remember two years ago you said you dont want to use andro... moreLike blackberry.....hahahhahaahha...
and what does Samsung have galaxy s duos,,,...
u should think before u say... Lol
- AnonD-65064
- uuj
nokia 520 black has rugged surface which is different from other colours..so it is the same with nokia x black colour...because it is a sort of scratch resistant
- Sheikh
- KIC
Its Very Nice Phone... its Orignal 3.2 MegaPixel camera... Camera is out class...
- ANKIT
- vG{
the smartfone has minimum features and maximum cost.
no front camera,512 mb ram.and only 3.2 megapixelo camera.
does not attract the user at this time.
- sharad
- YTF
moto g is much better than this only 500 is extra but you'l get double features than this.
- SK
- vbM
There is no front camera.
- Ricky
- Xus
OHH my God ,the Price of X in india is 8.5k,again a new nokia brand low spcification with high cost,in 8.5k we Get 3mp camra (shame),7.2mbp (3G where al other are 21mbp undr 5k),512mb Ram.nokia wakup yarr ,frm my side this Phone Should be Not More than 7.5k. Huh Nokia
- u
- U{s
If anyone bought this,then please reply how is the phone?
- sunny
- tUY
Price of phone is too much.. could be a better choice if they have luanched it at 6,500Rs. Right now as compaired to other option this phone costly. only pros is it is dual sim and 3g support but camera quality is very low,Ram is also very less for android 4.1.2 it gets hanged,i would say nice try by nokia but still not worth.. i would not recommend.. Nokia try better luck next time for android.. :)
- huz
- rKH
Good mobile.But opera is missed.Anyone know when opera available for nokia windows?
- ratspell
- uvV
i'm gonna wait for a few months until they launch another phone.
- AnonD-239835
- vGU
nokia has his own app store and third party stores. no need to worry abt apps
- Anonymous
- 7qB
I heard that nokia x dosnt have google play. Is it true?
- HIM
- Rxy
ex-user nokia, 09 Mar 2014Finally nokia use android...i still remember two years ago you said you dont want to use andro... moreMicrosoft purchased Nokia , its not the decision of Nokia anymore. Nokia stood for its words of not using Android till the end .
Respect..
- bunty
- KA4
very good device nokia x user interface are very nice bcz w8 abd androied both in both nokia xi like it nokia in come back in no. one catagory...........
- SALMAN KHAN
- utu
NOKIA++++++++ Its to late to apologies
- AnonD-242511
- sSJ
RAM 512 in Android mobile is it not less
- Sabu
- nXE
Nokia Lumia 520 is a better product in terms of specifications and it comes at is cheaper by about 11%. It gives faster internet speed and has a better camera (5 MP) in comparison with Nokia X's 3.15 MP. Hence, Nokia X does not seem to be cost-effective or giving value for money. It is clearly overpriced and its price should be reduced by at least 20%.
Tip us
1.5m 109k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up