i observed that if we use the camera ,tha battery will get discharged rapidly...i dont know why it is happening with nokia,,which is then name brand for battery life...
[deleted post]Hey control urself. We shouldnt use such a language. Mi kopam naku ardhamaindhi. Anyway, whatever it may be, nokia x2 is a very good handset for that price...
Anonymous, 18 Apr 2011hi wreck, do you know where i can see some sample pictures of cedar ? ;))here itslef in gsmarena---
x2>related phones>SE cedar>pictures
wreck you are making so many comments about Cedar that it is beggining to look suspicious.
xMAN, 18 Apr 2011x2 advantages :
1.value for money phn.
2.nice camera (still photo).
3.powerful flash (can b... moreyou missed something.
1.not that value for money phone,cedar may be.
2.massive loud speaker
6.5mp results in huge resolution images
7.average internet speed.
9.average network reception
1. screen flicks and blinks to black when
acesing oviplayer and begins playing a song
, low ram and heavy OS - a slow interface
2. camera is way pixelated with flash.
3. Symbian40 lacks multitasking
4. poor for video recording just 18fps that too max
bitrate recorded is 880kbps..
5. cant adjust display brightness.
6. poor or no side view in display
7. no 3g.
8. there is no such thing called nokia standard
in battery,nowadays all s40 phones drain out
in 1.5 days whereas s60 like c5 and some phones
like cedar rules with 4-4.5days.
9. no video calling
10. camera fails to absorb color.
11. no video with more resolution than 320*240 can be
12. headphone output lacks proper bass and calrity
13. keypad lacks blind typing.
14. plain design,phone tends to slipoff from hand.
15. speaker is a mess at high volumes.
Manoj, 18 Apr 2011How to adjust brightness in nokia x2its the limitation fo all s40 softwarre.you cnt adjust brightness.
i lost my nokia 5130 device after more than one year using it.iwana to buy an other one but i compare betwen nokia5130 and nokiax2 what is ur opinon pls
x2 advantages :
1.value for money phn.
2.nice camera (still photo).
3.powerful flash (can be used as torch).
4.no hanging issue with v4.90.
5.good UI with s40 6th edition.
7.good internet (excellent result by using uc browser).
9.excellent signal reception.
10.good sales pack content.
11.noise reduction facility.
12.good speaker performance.
14.aluminium back cover.
X2 disadvantages :
1.poor video performance.
2.speaker reproduces some noise when playing music.(reason-bass low and trible is too much high).
3.battery performance is not good as nokia standards.
it just hangs quite a while , when opened some apps....and sometimes slow too
As i got the experience to use X2, i found it's good but while u open photo viewer all photos are transferred to phone memory from memory card, it makes the device slow and sometimes get switched Off.Nokia should look into it for the software issues to get the problem resolved.Otherwise the phone is good for person who doesn't compare it from other models of nokia or samsung.
i use nokia on 2years. its amazing phone. its camera is super quality and amazing net speed.its music sound is high.don't waste a time. go and pu
AnonD-2965, 17 Apr 2011No. Neither of them. I'm just being neutral. Dude is it my fault if one of my phone outruns... moreWell said wreck. Cedar's a nice phone with great features more than enough for the average mobile user. As for me, I really don't care a lot about the looks, but the usability rules. But for such a price, have to admit, the X2 has a far nicer camera, with flash. But then, it doesn't support the 3G. Just the one thing i found missing in cedar is the secondary (video) call camera. Wonder why even a lot of the advanced phones lack it. Is there an alternative way to make video calls comfortably :)
xMAN, 17 Apr 2011se phns r just ok, bt nokia phns r 10 times better than any kind of se phns.I didnt said all nokia phones are cheap and all se phones are superb.
I said x2 is not good when compared with cedar that too with in-hand experience and testing both phones.
Not only x2, but most other s40 phones in the market today with a price tag of around 5000 is not worth cedar. Quality of S40 phones these days are getting lower and lower.
I loved using old superb s40 phones like nok 3110,3500.
But these days new devices are getting slower intrfaces and many bugs.
se phns r just ok, bt nokia phns r 10 times better than any kind of se phns.
Neither of them.
I'm just being neutral.
Dude is it my fault if one of my phone outruns its popular counterpart everytime I test them.
Every single detail i've posted comparing cedar and x2 is true.
Go check yourself.
What is the max video resolution x2 can play?
Its 320*240 .
a pixel more and just audio is played.
Whereas cedar can play n8 display (vga) resolution videos.360*640 low hd videos and all.
Similarly everything is true...
Having experience with both phones I'm just letting others to know about these details before they waste their money thinking x2's the only phone thats good in 5k group.
And by the way why are you bothering over me posting facts that proves x2 is cheap stuff,who are you, owner of nokia?U r Just a forumer.
If it still dont digest in you.go see a doctor.
[deleted post]I do think so ,
Wreck is only supporting SE .
he s the culprict.
My friend bought cedar phone as wreck said a lot good about that model .
But that model sucks , it looks like a child's video game.
Not stylish look and dull blue display