Video capture in QVGA at up to 20 fps
That is 320x240 20fps, really crap
Waste phone !! :
> No 16M colour display.
> No 3G (compared to Nokia 2730 classic)
> 5MP camera without autofocus
> Java o/s
bb, 29 Apr 2010so UGLY,but nice features.no!.... its cool... good looking.... wow" amazing Nokia....
i said WOW its cool Nokia ; ilove this one'....
once more; WOW!!!
Aweome.... 90 euro and 5 megapixel camera....!!
nokia rules all the way...
Nice features for a cheap phone, but why Nokia insists on having phones looking like toys with these ugly colors ? Look at Samsung, even cheap phones looks classy and expensive.
Friends, dont go too exited for 5 mp camera. Only exite for 4 speakers, 13 hours talktime , led flash, inbuilt fm antenna and cheap price...
Reason: This is a Music phone not a camera phone and also price is quite low according to the features so its camera will be comparable to 3 mp cameras..
tebs, 29 Apr 20105 mp not auto fucos?I think it's auto focus. Usually nokia phone those who have over 2 mp camera r auto focus. And we r talking about 5 mp here.
madhav, 29 Apr 2010nokia x2 or nokia c3 which one is more advance in featuresI think c3 wins. Bcoz it has much more features than x2. But it's way behind in camera. Now it's depending on ur way of look. If u like music, recording video, taking photos etc then x2 is d perfect phone for u. But if u like 2 use net, browsing, chatting, fb and twitter than c3 is d best. I think c3 wins bcoz it supports 3g, it has full QWERTY keyboard and it's 2 mp camera records video at 15 fps. Not a bad performance. So c3 is advanced than x2 expect for d camera.
hp81818181, 29 Apr 2010If GPS is in...Ya. Man. It's a really fine phone. It would b very awesome if there were gps or geo tagging and d browser had flash lite 3 supported. It's a awesome for for those who want a phone with a really good camera.