once the hp is hanged, there is nothing much u can do. u cannot remove the battery, except to wait for the battery to drain out... lousy phone
Kooga , 17 Jul 2011The problem wit nokia is price,their fons r 2 pricey yet nt superior. Fons lyk c5-o3,c6,x6,all... moreyes you are right :-) . if was compara nokia price vs samsung price , samsung won :( . nokia should focus more in price :-) .
snow_speeder, 14 Jul 2011apart from the big screen and rom is it better than Nokia n8? which 1 is better? N8 OR the x7??I tink x7 roxx
Its better if u x7 as its advanced tecgnolge
its worst smartphone in the world. phone has too many hardware problems.
The problem wit nokia is price,their fons r 2 pricey yet nt superior. Fons lyk c5-o3,c6,x6,all running symbian 6th edtn 0s not even s3 bt cost same as samsung with froyo,& huawei is coming big time in east africa with android midrange and thy r affordable unlyk nokia. Viva huawei!!
Had this phone a week for testing a month ago (Netherlands). It's NO GOOD! Symbian Anna still sucks. It's a bit faster in the menu but you have still changes from new (Anna) to the old version. Web browsing is a little bit faster with loading, but still irritating to use/same problems the old Symbian has. The sound is excellent from the stereo speakers. I think this is the loudest sounding phone at the moment. The screen is absolutely good but why??? so less pixels for a 4 inch. (Re)placing simcart and memorycard is a CRIME! The one at Nokia who designed this, must be fired. Camera is not one of the best: blurry pics with some noise too, no autofocus and the camera rocker is hard to handle. Battery life in online modus (regular use) is 1,5 days, offline modus a little more than 2 days. Build quality is good: part steel and plastics like the N8. I don't like the placement of the menubutton surrounded with black shiny glass, one press on it and you have a fingerprint.....after a day of use it's get smudged.
My opinion after a week use: Symbian Anna brings you nothing new, only some things are working better/ a bit faster. For music listening/video watching lovers is this phone maybe a good deal, but the price is to high for that alone. If you're a Nokia Symbian lover: buy the N8 instead of this one. O.k. the screen is a bit shorter but has more to offer for the money.
not worthy pricewise... n also odd looks doent feel comfortable.. camera is bad n no front camera
On the camera side, which one is better ?? Nokia X6-16GB or the Nokia X7 ??????
hey...guyzz don't follow this.... it has no front camera!!!
Now a days 3G network found almost everywhere... so its important a secondary camera for all smartphones to make a better video call...
TheProfessional, 15 Jul 2011I really hate the fact that it doesn't have a front-facing camera. Also, the lack of a 1GHz pr... morewhy don't you get a front facing camera, instead of this & the processor speed is 720Mhz, but stripped down to 680Mhz for normal use, & it will be utilized max when itz needed.
what ever it has its good its not a must to have a 1GHZz processor, Symbian 3 dint need it n the anna its more light, making the existing processor fast n responsive, while android os is big requires a faster processor.. Nokia myt put the 1GHz in the upcoming windows phone, n the reason its because the 'OS' mainly and what it requires... if thy put 1GHz in the x7 it wudnt make much diff..
nokia coperation is the best phone producing company in world.nokia go on with your phone technology improvement.
I really hate the fact that it doesn't have a front-facing camera. Also, the lack of a 1GHz processore is a disappointment.