You guys should take a look at the nokia 7250i!! The pictures taken on these babies whip the hell out of these 3!! The pictures are crystal clear much better than any of these. Failing that try buying a 6100 and connect the camera in the bottom!! the pictures are clear as hell and the colours are amazing!! Buy these insted of these 2nd rate phone cameras!!
Are you insane? look at the radio-active flower N73 captured. Nokia sucks as always. K800i took better pictures but still not best. Samsung also sucks but gives good results.
Here the Nokia N73 wins the arena, it am a samsung loyal person, but here i must say that the nokia had done really a good job...SonyEricson is also good, Here i would say that Samsung has not brought the conventional camera quality as it produces in other cameras...Anyways well done Nokia!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the n73 and the k800i are both good camera phones.. The pictures of both phones are sometimes better.. But with the firmware update of the k800i i personally think that he wiil be a bit better withtaking pictures..
Never the less they are both great phones..
A very close call, a very close call indeed. I have to say, congrats Nokia for producing the number 1 cameraphone on the market. I honestly must say that I never thought Iīd see the day. :D
Seriously though, the differences between the N73 and K800 were clear, but not ground breaking. The N73 pictures are more colorful, maybe too colorful in some cases. They were also a lot more sharper.
On the other hand, the N73 had some problems in picturing proper trees, they looked kinda washed out.
The K800 took over-all good pics, it had itīs problems but also itīs strongpoints. The flash didnīt save the day though... Over-hyped if you ask me.
The D900 did a noble effort but didnīt match the other two.
because there is a basic set of standards when judging picture quality. any camera review usually involves these basic qualities, such as colour, detail level, noise level, etc.
the n73 looks striking AT FIRST GLANCE, thats about it. if you bother to look further, you can see the lost in detailsm which makes the n73 pics look unnatural because they are both sharp and blur at the same time.
K800i is the winner is all angles SAVE the digital zooming at its maximum.
" obviously, N73 specially on the first page and almost all the shots are better. try to compare the leaves and twigs and you'll see! N73 shots are sharp, detailed and the colors is vivid.
while the k800 and D900 are blurry and the colors are just dull just like the same quality of a low end digicam."
n73 pics are detailed? are you and i even looking at the same set of pictures? look at the background leaves on trees and bushes taken by the n73. most of them, if not all, are splotches of shapeless green. if i made a cutout of the leaves portion, you wouldn't have the faintest ideas those are leaves.
why are those people saying "what a good picture should look like" and set kilomilligraphic standards of sharpness and all those rocket-scientist terms?
what really is a good picture? of course, a good picture should look beautiful, and
well, it depends upon what anyone would consider beautiful. one may say the n73 pics are dull because the colors over reproduced, or say the k8 has it's color almost like being photocopied or worse, the samsung is using an old camera with film(???) but no, there's no really such thing as what a good picture should look like and denounce other people for having such a shallow taste!!! just go ahead with your preference, and see if others have the same taste as yours too.
well for me, i am more arrested by the colorful and sharp pics of N73, plus it has a very solid build quality, and it has a loudspeaker too.
First of all, EVERY1 should agree with that, N73 overprocessed the pics so it will look very clear, non-blurry, noiseless etc.
Where K800 fails to give the images a crisp look but took an overall idea of what's the situation was.
And in my opinion the real scale is like this
n73---------R----K800 where "R" stands for real lighting condition, moreover i guess the K800 used to take the pics has an earlier firmware, I've seen better pictures by K800. and what more..umm..I rather not talk 'bout D900 (lol)
to all those people saying that k800's shots are close to natural? haha! you make me laugh!
are you blind?????
obviously, N73 specially on the first page and almost all the shots are better. try to compare the leaves and twigs and you'll see! N73 shots are sharp, detailed and the colors is vivid.
while the k800 and D900 are blurry and the colors are just dull just like the same quality of a low end digicam.
The Rock says: Two Thumbs-Up to S.E!I see you all jabronis like the Nokia!Aah,Plz!Its like Mama baking a cake and turned it side ways and there come another Brick Nokia which you jabronis can stick straight up you candy @ss!
You see,Who wants MS Word,Excel,PPt on Fone?if you REALLY wants application,go get yourself a desktop.Smartphones don't have any exceptional or worthy application.Their anitvirus,Never Clean virus,when virus attacks,the so-called SMARTphone Crash like jetplane with its 'Active' antivirus.
As Regard to the shoot-out,see you BLIND Nokiees,N73 darkens every picture, even if its taken in the noon,looks like it also can't see!Lols. It shows Supernatural colors,everything looks so vivid and colored(not original)if it you jabronis clean the background before N73 can take pictures. N73 fart when it came to Flash shoots.while K800 got it Smooth like Daylight!;)
The pictures with zoom, in the park, auto and buildings, K800 Whipps N73's handy-candy camera @ss!Lols
S.E not just whipps Nokia in the Camera dep,but also Color rendition in display, sound quality and manufacturing. nokia make funny fone bodies like Stone Cold wearing a Thong!!Smartphones are everything except Smart!Dull,inefficient and funny looking.
NOW!IF Ya Smellllllllllllllll.................La la Tongue la la........What The Rock&S.E....is Cooking!!Bullseye!
i think SE K800 wins the race.its pic much closer to nature.2nd place for Nokia n73.
so far it seems that the ones who says the n73 is better does not have analysis and comments of the pictures to back them up. thats the effect the n73 pictures have - use vibrant colors, sharpen smoothened and detail-lost pictures so that they have a good first 'wow' impression. but upon closer inspection, one can find the fundamental problems with the n73 pictures, which is lose of details and some colors just appear too unnatural and over-saturated, like blue and red colors.
details-wise, d900 seems to retain the most details, followed by k800i and n73 is at a distant 3rd.
I beg to disagree that samsung loses because the picture taken by d900's conventional/ordinary camera produces good result.
if only N73 and k800 is to be compared to samsung z710 then we can state the real score.
GSM ARENA you are so unfair, this site is the most bias all over the world.
the best is n73 followed closely by the k800 and the d900 is far behind
the matter of fact is that samsung totally loses.. it is no match with the se k800 and n73... the thing is that although se k800 comes with the famous cybershot label on it, it's just a normal cam.. not bad for a phone but it's nothing compared to the original cybershot cam.. in the pics, some of the se k800 taken ones are better.. but overall,.. i have to say that nokia wins this time..