Motorola Moto G (2014) review Comments

• AdamBoy64
• Fv4
• 23 Sep 2014

Think I'd prefer to find the original Moto G than the 2014 version.

• Reply

• Anonymous
• mRf
• 23 Sep 2014

I am dissapointed with the new Moto G i was expecting a higher clocked Snapdragon CPU at least 1.5-1.6 Ghz and at least 1.5-2 GB RAM but with a slightly higher price tag $25-€30 higher. If Motorola released Moto G with those specs it would sell more.

• Reply

• AnonD-306960
• 45F
• 23 Sep 2014

So basically the Moto G LTE is better or the same if you don't mind the worse camera, smaller screen, or no stereo speakers.

• Reply

• AnonD-282597
• 61X
• 23 Sep 2014

Are the speakers good enough like the old Moto G? Ouch, that battery life is pretty low...

• Reply

• Good_advice
• n{}
• 22 Sep 2014

BEFORE you buy - take a look at Motorola support forums - people are complaining about some basic bugs (drop of signal, issues with connectivity) for months and there is no response from Motorola: https://forums.motorola.com/hives/3ba9b2429c/summary. Buy only if you expect no customer support.

• Reply

• Anonymous
• TqY
• 22 Sep 2014

where's screen brightness? speaker loudness?

• Reply

• dontask
• L2s
• 22 Sep 2014

dontask, 22 Sep 2014Battery life is a flop. Don't know if they think it is ok to give such a weak battery and make... moreooops it's moto G.. my bad. Lack of sleep is bad for my brain..

• Reply

• dontask
• L2s
• 22 Sep 2014

Battery life is a flop. Don't know if they think it is ok to give such a weak battery and make it up with fast charger or what. But for me this is really really bad. It's like a phone from 2 years ago. 50h endurance and 6h web browsing..
I know I'm getting Xperia Z3 compact, best battery life!

• Reply

• Anonymous
• 01c
• 22 Sep 2014

Camera has improved a lot. :) now I'm sad that I bought the old Moto G for my wife 2 months ago lol. Should've waited for this one.

• Reply

• Anonymous
• NZq
• 22 Sep 2014

only 50R endurance rating.

• Reply