Those iPhone 6 benchmarks were insane. Totally didn't expect iPhones to wipe the competition like that.
I'm GSMArena reader for a year and I never seen in this website a phone that has more disadvantages than advantages! What a "great" poop...sorry I mean phone. Have a nice day. :) :) :)
Iridium, 28 Sep 2014LOL. Cool story but even a 3.5 year old S2 can already pump 550 MB/s through its RAM. Curren... moreBtw, the subject is not the speed of RAM but the speed of the Flash memory. Totally different things. FYI, the RAM gets data from the Flash, at the speed of the Flash, and provides it further to the CPU/GPU at the speed of the RAM(which only makes sense to be faster than the Flash).
So, the Flash memory is twice as fast as the Ram in your 3.5 years S2. Pretty good, huh?
Anonymous, 28 Sep 2014This is high end phone, it you was technical enough to understand Apple doesn't require quad c... more"doesn't require quad core and high ram apples dual core and 1gb ram"
Then how does this make IP6 a high end phone?
X = fake claims, 28 Sep 2014Um. So much nonsense it's hard to pick a starting point, but here's the first hint. The Not... moreReally? Prove it? I can see the benchmark results anyway. They are still below the iPhone 6 results. BTW, I'm not saying that the Note 4 is not fast, I'm just saying that iPhone 6 is faster! ;)
Iridium, 28 Sep 2014LOL. Cool story but even a 3.5 year old S2 can already pump 550 MB/s through its RAM. Curren... moreSorry but you missed the point. I've just given an example of what you could theoretically achieve with the memory speed of the iPhone. It doesnt mean that it happens. Of course you don't get the images for the screen from the Flash(you wouldn't need the GPU then). I just gave an example to make it easier to understand the differences between the devices. Still the main point is, the iPhone Flash memory is twice as fast as the memory on any Android device(due to double size bus) and that shows in the benchmarks.
I noticed this too - and I think it is that Apple must be rendering at 720p or 750p and upscaling, so the 6 plus can match the 6 at benchmarks. Of course, this is pretty huge if it were true; it would completely negate the benefits of the 1080p screen for anything that uses rendering! Can someone look into this further?
CJhn, 28 Sep 2014According to these specs this is a mid range phone not a high end phone. The only thing that i... moreThis is high end phone, it you was technical enough to understand Apple doesn't require quad core and high ram apples dual core and 1gb ram and still beats all high end android devices . Smh
Angry Mobile Nerd, 27 Sep 2014Ok I've never owned an iPhone but I really feel GSMArena was looking for every excuse in the b... moreFace Palm!
You have the Guts to argue with GSM Arena's review .
Please dont ever compare it to Gionee or other phone with half the prize or lower prize range. GSM arena talking about 1000 USD phone and when we say that. Consumer should atleast get premium and unique or should atleast put a bomb on its icrap to show this thing is unique wherein Apple Fails.
Sorry apple puts unique feature the ibanana thing.
The automatic transforming iwatch.
I guess all the hate makes android fans feel better stick with android don't hate apple. Such followers of android make fun Apple but Apple doesn't make fun back.
GFX Bench score iPhone 6+ 1080p resolution is better than iPhone 6 750p resolution, same GPU?!?!?
The first phone in GSMArena which has more Disadvantages that advantages.
CJhn, 28 Sep 2014According to these specs this is a mid range phone not a high end phone. The only thing that i... moreYeah. All these millions of people who bought it must be sooo much stupider than you.
Just the way you put a sentence together shows that you must be at least a genius plus.
harlekkin, 28 Sep 2014Please give us your definition of "high-end". galaxy s5, xperia z3, lg g3, htc one m8
Why is the protruding camera an issue? The Nexus 5 has one and no mention of it as a con in your review. I have both the N5 and iPhone 6...the camera protrusion issue is ridiculous.
According to these specs this is a mid range phone not a high end phone. The only thing that is high end is the $PRICE$.
All my life I used PC's and mobile phones from brands like Nokia, Motorola and Sony, what's all the fuss with this company is this a Chinese manufacturer of phones ? why they still have only 1 GB of RAM and low resolution screens ? only dual-core and no multitasking ? is this a joke ? or just a Nokia 3310 competitor ?