darkraver, 15 Mar 2015Nah, not trolling, trolling means bashing with unvalid points, but I assume some might see it ... moreCheck out displaymate.com detailed analysis of the new display. As far as cost/benefit. You may be right however I think will sell well because ppl like "shiny" things. It also supposedly has very good hand feel, which has been a turn off for me from Samsung for the s4 s5 and note 4. My gf is diehard apple and knows nothing about the specs but this is the first android phone that has her saying she wants it and might switch from apple. There are more PPP like that then die hard techys
there is a guy on youtube that works for samsung and he unboxes the s6 . he is a sales guy and he is in training to learn about the s6 features so he can demonstrate to the customer and in the comments he gets a lot of requests for a battery test and this was his reply .......... Unfortunately I was told on the 12th of march to avoid battery testing because I have a 'training device' and there will be new updated software on the retail version of the Samsung Galaxy S6 upon its release (April 10th in the UK). Therefore any tests I do wouldn't be a true reflection of the device. Everything else on the phone I should be able to test in full.
It looks like smartphone for an old, fat lady. I don't like the look of the metal frame. Design wise, i'm still inlove with the xperia z1. The metal frame was fantastic. its like mobile phone for james bond or batman. Lol
no upgradeable memory, fixed battery, high prices, no fm... samsung what are you doing? You acquire the worst of apple
AnonD-359663, 15 Mar 2015Amoled screen need no backlight and are brighter naturally. Also this unit tested is pre-relea... moreNah, not trolling, trolling means bashing with unvalid points, but I assume some might see it that way...
So, in short, enlighten me, what exactly makes amoled screen of s6 different and 20% more energy efficient compared to amoled screen of s5?
Tech talk please
Oh, and, i am of an opinion that it will flunk
Based on worst cost/benefit ratio in an android flagship ever
Was Stephen Elop in charge of this model design? Sounds dangerous for Samsung.
AnonD-374800, 15 Mar 2015Wow. Calm down there. You are an angry one aren't you. First I never said I was buying the 64G... moreAm calm as a cold chicken, dont you worry about that
And less ignorant than most, but well...most will not agree B-)
AnonD-147044, 15 Mar 2015More efficient display? Are you out of your mind? It has way higher pixel density which means ... moreAmoled screen need no backlight and are brighter naturally. Also this unit tested is pre-release version. The battery life is much better when released.
Also yes darkraver is an very angry and everything he posted is invalid. He is trolling and bashing because S6 is the perfect device.
Anonymous, 14 Mar 2015I'm actually shocked at the battery life. By all accounts it should be a lot better. More effi... moreMore efficient display? Are you out of your mind? It has way higher pixel density which means it consumes more power, you need more light to make it look just as bright as a display with less pixel density. And then you also have to take additional processing needed into account but I guess the more efficient SoC will compensate it. But the higher consumption of the display itself still remains.
The PPI race is the cancer that is killing battery life. There will be no difference to the human eye under normal conditions compared to 440ppi. We need the subhumans to buy phones like this though because we need higher PPI screens for virtual reality.
I get anoyed with the negative response... I get the feeling they are just jealous and bashing the s6 to feel better about them self... get a life And a different phone!
Im gonna get the s6 Edge 64gb and can't wait to get my hands on it :-X wel done samsung!
I really don't want to sound arrogant, and am really not, but this S6 has surprisingly disappointed more than S5 did last year. The upgrade formula was very simple, but Samsung clearly went the easy way this time, putting more brains and less heart into it. I see "business perspective" everywhere in this device. It was very easy to upgrade on Galaxy S5 if Samsung had done it in 2 simple steps.
1. Keep the best features of your previous model intact (don't even think about replacing them, HTC's omitting OIS from M8 ios a clear example) .
2. Listen to your consumers' complaints and try to solve them. Don't be too arrogant by putting your personal ideas into it which are VERY VERY useless for the general customer.
But Samsung has really disappointed me this time. In no way is it a bad phone, NOOO!, I am definitely not calling it a bad phone, but it isn't a worthy successor either except for design overhaul and some other additions here and there ( which are by no means unachievable for the 2 upcoming flagships from Sony and LG).
Better aesthetics and hardware.
No microsd, No removable battery, less battery life.
Really, just get a LG G2 for less but with the same functionality.
darkraver, 15 Mar 2015And...you missed the point too. Most android users ready to cash out that kind of money for a... moreWow. Calm down there. You are an angry one aren't you. First I never said I was buying the 64Gb so idk where you got that from. Second, let's look at the facts here Mr. grumpy pants. If its going to flunk why do we have the Norwegian carrier reporting 4x the # of preorders that the gs5 received. Why do we have carrier preordering 20 million? In the GS5 first 3 months it only sold 12 million! So before normal consumers can even buy it Samsung is beating last years numbers and their own conservative projection of 13 million units. I wish I knew you in person because I'd love to take this bet. $1000 would be a fair bet. Let's shake on it. ;) Hopefully you're not this angry in every day life.... Cheer up mate. Its just a phone, but damn look at the facts and stop being so ignorant.
AnonD-374800, 15 Mar 2015Also. You completely missed my point. YOU can choose whatever phone you want. My point was dir... moreAnd...you missed the point too.
Most android users ready to cash out that kind of money for a flagship do care about tech solutions you mentioned and watch reviews on sites like these
Samsung is android, and aims at different type of users with big cash, those that think more about cost benefit of what they buy...
So some diehard samsung fans will buy it, a percentage of design oriented buyers who dont know crap or care about what is under the hood will buy it...and that is it.
Most powerusers that think about value for their money will not buy it...
You must really be stupid to cash out that kind of money for the 64gb variant, which only is viable for its features like big heavy graphic games, 4k video recordings etc...
Some users dont play games or record 4k, but then...why would they buy this phone if same features they need come in other much better cost benefit phone models?
It will flunk
Basically i don't like Samsung. Samsung device may be a good in technology, innovation, design but i hate this because they always eat more RAM for their useless bloatwares. They almost eat more than 75% of RAM. i am owner of Galaxy S4 and used two more Samsung devices.. I am waiting for Google play edition of S6.. will see
AnonD-225521, 15 Mar 2015Useful conversations? I see his contributions as more useful than yours. Listing negative t... moreAlso. You completely missed my point. YOU can choose whatever phone you want. My point was directed at the 90% of consumers who won't even visit this site. The iPhone type consumers. That is who Samsung is targeting. Apple made 88% of all profits from smartphones last year. There is a reason for that. Emulating them is the smart move. You really need to look at this from the business's point of view. Further, I am open to constructive conversation, however he was simply stating the same thing over and over. Which is annoying and pointless.
AnonD-225521, 15 Mar 2015Useful conversations? I see his contributions as more useful than yours. Listing negative t... moreComplaining about the battery at this time is pointless. We need to wait for final software and not judge on one rushed review. As far as his other complaints. Yes no micro SD and non removable battery. We know big deal. Go get a different phone. Stop repeating it. Samsung won't care unless they sell less phones or profits go down. However if profits are up then it proves you're in the minority and that is all that matters. Wake up. Companies are controlled by shareholders and shareholders only care about one thing. PROFIT. Taking out the expandable storage is a fast way to massively increase profits. Removing battery increases profits further. If I was a company with hardware that destroys all the other android phones out there and sets me apart. I'd do exactly what Samsung is doing. And then I'd release the active with waterproofing and a bigger battery for the few whiners who wanted that. More profit. -From a small business owner.
"Gorgeous. Powerful. Special. Different"
gorgeous = look-and-feel of Alpha,
Powerful = obviously more powerful than last generation
Special = Not special at all compared to other non-expandable devices without removable batteries.
Different = loss of MAJOR features that used to be standard on S-series
"Anyway, the Galaxy S6 was redone from scratch and bids farewell to plastic."
That's what Samsung let everybody believe yet you seem to forget their prior experiments with the Alpa and Note 4. Bidding farewell to plastics WITHOUT loss of typical Galaxy S-features, THAT would cause real respect for the Koreans. What they did now is disgusting! The ditched every features that made them unique and copied everything else from everyone else. Even its looks. If it wasn't for that ugly protruding camera then that Galaxy S6 looks indistinguishable from an iPhone 6 :-(
"...depending on how upset you are with the missing card slot and sealed battery - they're copying Apple and Sony"
I am very upset. They betrayed the things that really made them different. They betrayed the customers whom DO value the typical galaxy features like removable battery and expandable storage space.
"...the other options being 64GB and 128GB."
Which are probably never to be found in stores since stores only buy a small subset of the different models (with their limited budgets).
Not to mention that 32GB is the BARE minimum you actually need since you can't install applications on SD-cards (anymore) and you only have about 25GB free useable storage.
"A microSD card, regardless of specs, would have compromised the user experience"
You obviously don't understand why some of us NEED external storage options. SO I hope YOUR phone breaks down when you haven't gotten a backup of your photos to your PC or cloud. The real advantage is that even IF your phone breaks down that you still have some data on that micro-SD-card (especially photos and movies) since SD-cards are more rugged than the actual phones themselves.
"... The back of the phone is where the slightly protruding..."
slightly protruding? Are you blind. That thing is gigantic. It's 1/4 of the dept. That's not a a tiny bump. Even Pamela Anderson's rack is less daunting than this bump.
"...massive boost to QHD - 2560 x 1440 pixels."
Another massive squandering in battery-life, endurance and stamina. Especially on such a small screen. Combined with the smaller (compared to S5) battery this is a complete fuck up!
"...The Samsung Galaxy S6 has a practically unlimited contrast ratio, as it's capable of displaying black by simply turning off individual pixels - AMOLEDs light up only the parts of the screen that display a color different than black."
Which is completely ridiculed by Android Lolipop's primary use of white throughout it's UI. Our only hope is that Samsung eventually creates a "theme" that changes as much as possible to finally make proper use of AMOLED's battery-saving capabilities.
BTW, from the tables I can see that the S5's display is brighter and light blue is also NOT good for AMOLed screens. We need BLACK, Morons! But I get it. Next year when Android 6 comes about they change the UI into AMOLed friendly and call it "project Volta advanced", by then Google's Nexus don't have AMOLed screens anymore (since Huawei don't use AMOLED-screens in their devices and they are seen as the new Nexus-partners) unlike the current flagship Nexus 6 NOW!
"As it turns out, we were right to be worried as the Galaxy S6 posted lesser performance on all of our test compared to the Galaxy S5."
Something we, tech-savvy users, have been saying ALL along. Not to mention that all that white in Lolipop's UI isn't helping either!
A suggestion for GSMArena's team is to re-test the S5 as well. To compare an S5 with KitKat to a Lolipop variant.
"..Samsung Pay is KNOX-secured, which means the Galaxy S6 users should be getting government-grade protection of their personal data."
... which deter from rooting your device as well. Killing 2 birds with on stone, closing up Android and enforcing privacy through Samsung's services. KNOX should have been an optional feature for download if wanted (or required).
"...Playable framerates at full resolution, however, are no-go for complicated 3D games so we're guessing game makers will stick to 1080p for now..."
Which is the MAIN reason why users with some common sense prefer 1080P screens on these smartphones. We'd rather have better frame-rates (at still a very high resolution) than lower or equal frame-rates using a ridiculous 1440P screen at 5.1".
But I guess common sense went out the window when Andy Rubin left Google (Lolipop) and when Samsung started "Project Zero". I guess Project Zero means "Use Zero braincells to develop the new device" or in layman's terms "copy as much as you can from everyone else and pray they don't sue us" :-(
"...These apps cannot be uninstalled, but merely disabled."
Oh Dear, these bloody Koreans STILL don't understand the concept of bloatware. I don't want Microsoft's crap-ware on my phone either. These things both from Google and M$ should be optional and downloadable from the website when you want them. Instead of making them obligatory and wasting storage-space.
And there I was, thinking that Samsung would actually listen to its actual customers but instead they just switched bed with yet another bad US company with even LESS regard for end-users privacy than the last one.
"The loudspeaker is average in loudness and quieter than the Galaxy S5"
And that already is too quiet for hands-free calling, ringtones, navigation-directions etc... I really miss the extremely loud Nokia 808pureview (with audio patch). You can even hear that when in a pouch and in a backpack and in the back of your car. That device too had a single loudspeaker so why can't Samsung do what Nokia could?
Sure this S6 will (eventually) sell. Everyone who skipped the S5, mostly S4 users thus, are on the end of their 2-year plan and are looking for a new toy. This device comes along so they go for this one. Especially the tech-illiterate bunch whom don't investigate things prior to buying (and therefore don't read sites like this amongst others).
Samsung's board will hail their new full metal but less on features approach, instead of using common sense. And next when the current S5 owners (the last true Galaxy S) need a new device a next S7 comes about. Thinner, lighter, even less features and will be avoided like the plague. Then the clueless Samsung board (whom have apparently no vision of their own) can wonder again why their estimates don't come true.
This IS the beginning of the end.