Something is wrong with this review. The display has been praised so much and I myself have a Moto X Play and the display is definitely quite good. Yet the rating given is only 2.50/5.0.
Also the battery life deserves a rating of at least 3.0/5.0 if not more. The fact that the higher battery capacity makes the phone thick should come under the design factor. The point about a Turbo Charger not being supplied along with the phone was valid earlier but now the Turbo Charger does come along with the phone at a lower price.
AnonD-506194, 11 Mar 2016the reason the battery gets a low score is because it has a much larger capacity than the Note... moreI understand that it's not being compared to the Note 5, but since when is having a high capacity a con(if so, the Mate 8 should get a low score)?
It sure affects thickness, but shouldn't that only be factored in the design score?
The display score should've been a little higher. Rest all is OK with me. The battery should really be delivering more with that much capacity but then again the 615 chipset ain't the most power efficient in the market.
Anonymous, 10 Mar 2016Something is wrong with the scores guys,
It's display, compared to that of the LG V10 (which... morethe reason the battery gets a low score is because it has a much larger capacity than the Note5..is noticeably thicker..then still has a lower battery endurance score
I'm assuming you didn't even read how these "time-saver" reviews work..it's not even being compared to the Note5
apertotes, 10 Mar 2016I think display, battery life and software scores should be higher. The display is even highli... moreIf the camera have ois2 that LG g4 use this must be best camera for budget phone
Something is wrong with the scores guys,
It's display, compared to that of the LG V10 (which has a score of 5) is better calibrated and with far higher brightness.
The battery life is also just 2 hours off that of the Note 5 which gets 5 stars.
This time saver edition should be called no brainer edition.Keep up the good work guys.