aleluya somebody that says it, i changed my iphone 6s plus for my lgg4 because of the camera and in the camera because of the fucking black lines, i love 16,9 photos.
and i wanted a 7 edge, but 9 megapixel 16,9 photos ?
ITS A JOKE
The S7 produces better images overall than the S6. In the S7 they are slightly cleaner (much more so in low light), have a bit better colour and have a fair amount more detail the closer you get to the edge of the frame. Would have been even better if it came equipped with the Samsung sensor.
When am I going to get the Android M 6.1 Update for Indian Variant of Samsung Galaxy Note 4 SM N910G. It was told that the Stable Update will be ready by February 2016, and all the Note 4s will get the Upgrade by March Second Week.
Today, I tried OTA Once Again..
But all it said was this: Software update
The latest updates have already been installed.
Android N seems to arrive very soon by Q3.. Please Samsung Do Some Magic.. Send OTA to India atleast as promised..
Thanks in Advance.
Anonymous, 14 Mar 2016However i do say they could have easily kept the 16mp if they were only increading pixel size ... moreThey could increase low light performance with their white pixels tech while getting more - 20Mp(1.7/1.6 aperture would be enough). I guess main reason is focus tech and low profile, with old way of getting good performance - big pixels, so again forsaken resolution for looks. If note 6 come as copy of that, I cannot be too happy.
Anonymous, 14 Mar 2016People who say camera is a dissapointment are fools.
The focus is a huge improvement and basi... moreIt is not a dissapointment, but is just not better, where it gained some aspects, it lost some too.
You sound whisfull...
Look at comparisson shots to S6.
Anne, 14 Mar 2016Psst Touchwiz started on S5.
i can proof it. go open a webpage with a lot articles in a single page. then scroll it up and down.
you'll se the horrible lag.
such problem is never happen in ios, and rarely happen in stock android. you should blame lagwiz for that. lagwiz ruins android performance, and gives bad reputation to android.
Force Majeure, 13 Mar 2016But the iPhone 6 has barely got a res over 720p?I am talking about iphone 6s plus dude it is 1080p...that is more than enough.....
Anne, 14 Mar 2016Bull. Core 2 core isn't the same as a Quadcore. Core 2 Quad has never existed. AMD8 isn't i5 ... morelove the hate Anne. iHerd? LOL. iPhone's breakdown more? Never heard such a load of rubbish in all my life. Personally, working in a phoneshop, I can assure you which gets more returns/faults. and besides, even if iPhone does breakdown, well, just take it in to an Apple shop and get it sorted there and then within minutes, not sending off for repair for 7-10 days like most other manufacturers. You are the idiot with all this 'iHerd' nonsense. You use what you want, let others use what they want, people shouldnt be judged on their choice of smartphone. Clearly both platforms are extremely powerfull and for most users, both platforms will do everything they want it to. Your hate is not needed
Tom-Helge, 13 Mar 2016Maybe you should read this: http://www.androidauthority.com/fact-or-fiction-android-apps-only-... moreOk. I have read it. always understood big.little. But from that article what I can see, is that the 3rd party apps were relying heavily on 1 or 2 cores, not taking advantage of any more from a performance standpoint really. I would personally take 2 good cores rather than 4 cores of lesser performance
Ecpected a little more out of speaker and battery too.
Is it a 1.5watt speaker?
However i do say they could have easily kept the 16mp if they were only increading pixel size to 1.4um.
Heck they could have even attempted 20mp at that.
For 12mp it should have been at minimum 1.6um. They could have tried for up to 2um.
People who say camera is a dissapointment are fools.
The focus is a huge improvement and basically the best out there. Its a huge plus.
And of course the increaed light gathering from pixels and aperture.
Those things all added together actually counteract the dropped resolution and retain or improve fine detail.
Plus the improvement in dynamic range is a very welcome.
I saw the camera samples of the G4 on the review and then compared them with the samples taken with the S7. The camera of the G4 is better than the camera of the S7.
Anonymous, 13 Mar 2016The camera is a disappointment. The S6's camera takes equal or better images in all conditions... moreAgreed...
It seems this dualpixel is just a marketing stunt to sell a refurbished s6 with cheaper camera tech
It should ve been called s6++
This is S6 repacked, with added waterproof and sd card
Camera stayed the same quality, but looses on detail now due to 12 mpx
Really overall Nothing to write home about against S6...
Almost the same phone
But the hype...
...I didn't see it because I don't look at video comparison often(n4 and s7 stills are similar in good light), but nothing comes close in the amount of details(in good light) in video of note 4, z5,g4,950,s6e+,6s even S7. N4 is daylight video king(well, no 4k from 808/1020).