Anonymous, 18 Apr 2016Could you read the full article before you comment kid? They already said that: "Before examin... moreDid you hear about z, z1, z2, z3, z3+ and z5's shitty camera performance, kid?
AnonD-527839, 19 Apr 2016same old story... over and over again. same old design. same old ...deception.I agree with you. Why do samsung keeps on giving us the same old story over and over again. The same phones but different name. *sigh*
AnonD-527839, 19 Apr 2016same old story... over and over again. same old design. same old ...deception.Most device lines don't change much. Get over it
same old story... over and over again. same old design. same old ...deception.
Sony still struggling with foliage detail, they are pixllelated the heck out to look like large boxes.
as a listerner to music i always try to know about speaker quality...can u pls tl how well listening to music in the sony x is
Aspros, 18 Apr 2016Wtf? Since when gsmarena became a camera dedicated site? I thought it was a mobile device sit... moreYou do know that this isn't a full review, right? And how can they even test for most of what you mentioned when they were without their tools since they're in japan. Wait for the review and stop complaining.
Just maybe this will cost $400... This will be the M5 replacement, more memory, better processor, but lack of 4k recording and without water proof....
i am dissapointed .. camera samples are soft with little details and sharpness.. 23 mb camera quality is less than 12 mp iphone camera ... i m a fan of sony but if sony want to explode the sony mobile part it is expensive way instead they can get help from north korea to blow them with small nuclear bomb ... goodbye sonyMobile forever .. i go to other rubbish phones that are better than ur amazing phones in camera quality ..
Anonymous, 19 Apr 2016That proves absolutely nothing. Good try thoughWho said that proves anything ?
it's just a comparison of full res lowlight at same crop size, with about same amount of artificial light and same colors, so judge difference in quality yourself ;)
AnonD-404798, 19 Apr 2016it already beat S7 in lowlight performance ;) http://i.imgur.com/odmWixM.jpgThat proves absolutely nothing. Good try though
AnonD-237389, 18 Apr 2016Because it's not a flagship ,x performance is not a flagship,sony put 1080p video recording to... moreI understand why it's potentially not there, I don't need that explained. That's different from what I'm trying to say. I'm only miffed they'd artificially gimp the devices through software. I plan to get the next compact flagship regardless, providing it has everything I'm looking for.
am i the only one here who thinks the xperia M5 is a better-valued phone than this?
already released, has *almost* the same set of cameras, almost the same processing power, same amount of ram, but is waterproof and can record 4k to boot?
Aspros, 18 Apr 2016Wtf? Since when gsmarena became a camera dedicated site? I thought it was a mobile device sit... moreCuz A modern generation love to capture about they day life, that why Sony make phone with great camera
Respectable photos and video. The low light photo looks quite good for 2 lux.
Has FM, IR and stereo speakers. Not sure why it isn't IP certified. Guess that's reserved for their top of the line X Performance.
Overall looks to be a nice phone.
Mark, 18 Apr 2016Small battery, no OIS for the camera, too many megapixels (23) = small pixels = poor low light... moreI suggest you to see the comparison of z5p with other phones which have OIS and be surprised how easily sony 's steady shot defeat them,
Wow. Those images are very promising. A little noise with lots of fine natural detail in a very wide shot with good colors and dynamic range.
Though for that first low light selfie i didnt lime the effect. It was brighter but not much difference in detail or noise line claimed. But much less natural.
The second one however definitely better.