Though It is going to be launch in India... Im not going to grab it.
This product by Sony is superb but the price is Skyhigh...
Will wait for some time...
papercut, 21 May 2016Agree and +1 for you
"In my experience though most people only claim a review to be biased ... moreAye and thanks,
Whilst I'm sure the people writing the reviews for this site have their personal favourites, as far as I can tell they do their best to keep those opinions out of the reviews.
Take this review for example, there's as much praise in there as there is critique, it's in a word: balanced.
The Sony fans (like fans of others oems, in all fairness) just wanted 6 or 7 pages of: 'it's the best device at everything ever' repeated over and over.
Tann Hauser, 21 May 2016And P. S.
Review FORGOT to mention QNOVO based battery tech...
One of THE more important ... moreIs qnovo doing anything though? Looks lime the claims were largely exaggerated. Gsmarena gave it a poor endurance rating and said its slow to charge, so the battery not deteriorating may have been exaggerated too.
It is only a software implementation used in this case so that might be the reason why.
So another Sony flagship with poor camera performance. I'm amazed how is this possible considering Sony's experience in standalone cameras. Apparently their departmens do not cooperate with each other.
And why in the hell there's no OIS in a flagship device (even the Performance model lacks it)?
Lex79, 21 May 2016If you believe this site biased in its reviews, why are you here???
Personally if I thought... moreAgree and +1 for you
"In my experience though most people only claim a review to be biased when the conclusions differ with the opinion of the person making the accusation."
That is what Sony fanboy said when reviewer site give a bad criticsm (but actually they trying to be honest) But those fanboys can't accept it.
[deleted post]Why are people like you so thick?
This phone costs the same amount as the s7 but has less ram and doesn't even have the best midrange chipset while the s7 has the best high end chipset.
You think Sony are being reasonable with the price? You must be insane.
[deleted post]If you believe this site biased in its reviews, why are you here???
Personally if I thought a tech review site held bias, I would neither read it's reviews or go to the trouble of registering a profile and posting comments on the site.
In my experience though most people only claim a review to be biased when the conclusions differ with the opinion of the person making the accusation.
in spite of what you are saying sony does makes profits out of their mobile division (around 20%) because it has been established as the android premium brand and (obviously) people are willing to pay a premium for sony phones. the x is indeed hugely overpriced but its price is going to be around half, come christmas, maybe sooner. (for instance the m5 and z3 cost below 280 euro).
[deleted post]Trust me, this is the best review X can get. Sony invited them to tokyo and give them an x for review unit. Ofcourse sony asked for good review. They did their best, but they just cant lie.
For example, battery life. They just can give it 100h, bcz people will prove it wrong. Then they are no more reliable.
The vrge will have more honest review.
[deleted post]Maybe DxOmark will, maybe they won't.
But you spend the last several months disrespecting DxoMarks conclusion by calling their current highest rated camera phones (namely the S7 and HTC 10) crap as far as their photography quality goes.
Yet before that your were DxO's best friend when the Z5 was on top.
So why would their opinion suddenly count again if they were to rate the Xperia X higher???
Your bias has backed you into a corner on this front Tann, and that's made you look like an absolute hypocrite.
another overpriced sony stinker. another half billion $ loss for the mobile division? LOL
Tann Hauser, 21 May 2016And P. S. Review FORGOT to mention QNOVO based battery tech... One of THE more important ... moreWhat is there to mention, with a battery rating of a measly 67h in the year 2016 ?
AnonD-442781, 21 May 2016That's the thing, it isn't. You can get an iPhone 6s for £539 on their website. The xper... moreXperia x
13 selfie camera
4.7 inch screen
5mp selfie cam
Still think Xperia x is a rip off??
And P. S.
Review FORGOT to mention QNOVO based battery tech...
One of THE more important innovation that Xperia X brings
Funny that, isnt it?
AnonD-284211, 21 May 2016You all should try this X in person to know what it really is_ somehow the reviews are just of... moreTrue. Changing to metal build...no more glass breaking
And Xperia is...just Xperia....
most feature rich and best looking multimedia apps with most complete feature package for a phone.
Nexus and Motorolas phones come close, but not such good native apps and features
Overall Xperias are best android based packages IMO.
They do price it though.
Being expensive though doesnt change the fact its best in its class.... ;-)
I just say sayonara sony for so many year i used....now i have samsung phone (as a fan i really disappointed)
AnonD-237389, 21 May 2016Sony never exit from moblie world, still sony has edge over chinees and koreans in quality, an... moreSony has contemplated on selling off its mobile division before. (Just like they did with Vaio)
So i wouldn't say, Sony will never exit mobile world.
AnonD-56158, 21 May 2016Sony like all Japanese electronics manufacturer can no longer compete against the Koreans and ... moreSad but true.
Sony Mobile will end up like Sony Ericsson.
They continue to produce mediocre over-priced phones. (Exactly what SE was doing before the split)