Sony Xperia X review Comments
- AnonD-404798
- d%{
Anonymous, 21 May 2016Cant believe theres no Smallapps. One of Sony's best exclusive features and they got rid of... moreYeah I don't get it either why remove such good feature ? I hope X Performance will have those because I get used to SmallApps and use them a lot almost every day...if not it will be hard to adopt such change for me :(
- Anonymous
- wry
Tann Hauser, 20 May 2016Beautiful device :-) Pretty bland looking device.
- AnonD-404798
- d%{
AnonD-287672, 20 May 2016They said that the sound is just OK and the camera review states that it's good but not great :(then check out the review again... from my personal experience sound is the best feature of Xperia devices nothing comes close if you connect any decent earphones,they said it's OK because speakers aren't very loud(and this was always the case with every Xperia that has stereo speakers) but sound is of good quality .
you have photos taken with the X in the review so judge camera quality for yourself . imo it's of great quality.
- Anonymous
- wry
Cant believe theres no Smallapps.
One of Sony's best exclusive features and they got rid of it.
Absolutely stupid. Typical Sony logic nowadays.
UI is the only thing thats good on this.
- KTL
- qIH
What is Sony thinking? I honestly have no clue on direction Sony mobile division is heading, Sony shouldn't even announce this X series at all. Its quite not that interesting and pretty disappointed. I mean its like a step back for Sony. Honestly, the phone itself has nothing new, excepts: predictive auto focus, metal back and curve display. As much as I love to Sony previous products and satisfied with the z5 compact, but for me to anxiously hear about the launch of this phone and spec sheet... NO THANKS Sony you've just lost a loyal fan.
Cons:
-overpriced for a midrange (mediocre chipset performance)
-poor audio quality
-no water resistant
-shorter battery life
-z3 compact alike design (just a curved glass and back metal)
-no small app for multitasking
-no 4k
-camera and video interface is the same
-video and camera performance is still avg at best.
Honestly I've had z3c and currently using z5c, both were great phones and I love it. However for Sony to market the X series as a beginning chapter of Xperia's? PLEASE SONY RECONSIDER A SECOND THOUGHT BEFORE LAUNCHING THE X SERIES...WHY SONY...WHYYYY?
- Anonymous
- wry
Tann Hauser, 20 May 2016Its the best in its class phone.... All flagshipworthy features in sound, camera, screen, sof... moreNope. Only people with more money than brains would buy this.
- kenboi2
- q9y
Not bad, but battery is a let down. Let's see what the X performance can do.
- AnonD-404798
- d%{
AnonD-451592, 20 May 2016I think that sony has decided to throw away the 4K video shoot from the X series becuse,seriou... moreIs this what you are talking about ?
1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQYlAX9_bbE
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rH2wSrThYHg
- papercut
- tx4
It's the worst overpriced midrange phone.
Camera is noisy.
Screen isn't the best.
Audio quality isn't the best.
You better get S7 or G5
- AnonD-442781
- pJm
Price is quite literally everything when it comes to midrange. If it wasn't for price you'd buy a flagship after all, that's kinda the point. Its completely shameless to be selling a midrange for 600 euros when you can get a flagship like the s7 for as low as 560 euros on eBay. It doesn't even have the best midrange chip either
Not even their flagship is worth 600 euros since it doesn't have 1440p, has less ram, and can't record 4k.
- AnonD-287672
- rAf
Tann Hauser, 20 May 2016Its the best in its class phone.... All flagshipworthy features in sound, camera, screen, sof... moreThey said that the sound is just OK and the camera review states that it's good but not great :(
- AnonD-531620
- 3JY
Tann Hauser, 20 May 2016Its the best in its class phone.... All flagshipworthy features in sound, camera, screen, sof... moreI agree that this is probably the best midrange handset available, but it priced against superior flagships, the S7 and G5 are both cheaper. As for the chip set, the Sd 652, would have made more sense at this price, as would IP68. Sony have got this one wrong!
- AnonD-451592
- ajP
I think that sony has decided to throw away the 4K video shoot from the X series becuse,seriously now,who in this world takes 4K videos with a sony xperia ? You can't even make a 1 minute 4K movie without geting the phone warm and the camera app stop working.
- Tann Hauser
- Bmu
Its the best in its class phone....
All flagshipworthy features in sound, camera, screen, software, with high end mid SoC.
Extraordinary good benchmark results.
We can only wonder how good X performance will perform :-)
People with enough cash and respect for quality will buy this beauty. ;-)
P.S. They forgot to mention qnovo battery tech...
- Anonymous
- ajM
Wow, a Lumia 640 does a few things better? Better loudspeaker, better sound quality, better battery life and also has Gorilla Glass 3? Not to mention the comparable screen quality (even if it's lower res) and overall performance because WP it's a less resource hungry OS. If a 30 f#cking bucks does all those better, why on earth would anyone buy this phone that's as expensive as a competitor's flagship like the Galaxy S7? Sony has gone nuts.
@SONY, I'm looking for a job as a manager. I could save your ass, so just hire me.
- mir
- t7X
Looks like sony has stopped trying. And can't they just reduce the resolution of the main camera a bit? Because they clearly would benefit from larger pixel sizes, since their noise reduction algorithms are clearly not up to the job.
- Anonymous
- pWQ
Anonymous, 20 May 2016It's certainly not a lookerThis. Too damn boxy as every other Sony in my opinion. No thanks.
- the tech nerd
- 2Ta
[deleted post]Nope ,x performance has some kind of brushed metal back and xperia x has simple metal back, whats wrong with gsmarena, tgey cant differentiate between metal and frosted glass back ,thats just bad
Tip us
888k
156k 74k
1.1m
RSS
Log in I forgot my password Sign up