Sony Xperia X review Comments
- the tech nerd
- 2Ta
Sony now sucking at music output and stereo speakers,pricing, i wont be suprised that it will cost same as z sony z5 on launch and xp will cost like as z5 premium was, dissapointed from sony
- Sumon
- uNV
Once again ga is not happy with camera. Just download a photo and check it out it is on par with today's flagship standard
- AnonD-142370
- PTF
They use polycarbonate because of antenna, who needs 100% metal design to make it become non-antenna?
Sorry of multiple post because can't edit.
- AnonD-142370
- PTF
Source: https://talk.sonymobile.com/t5/Xperia-X-Performance/Xperia-X-Performance-not-have-metal-frame/td-p/1097938
XA : Plastic
X : Metal rear and Metal-effect polycarbonate frame, So it's always plastic, not a good material for me
XP : Brushed Metal rear (Graphite Black & White only) and Metal-effect polycarbonate frame
- AnonD-538833
- X$T
Agree with the reviewers It's a great mid-high phone but its too expensive. Sony needs to price their phone competitively.
- AnonD-531620
- 3JY
AnonD-527105, 20 May 2016to be fair x is twice as powerful as A9I agree, but I was making a point about Sony's pricing strategy, the galaxy S7 and LG G5 are both more powerful flagships that are cheaper than Sony's midranger, it's Madness!
- Lex79
- LhN
AnonD-527105, 20 May 2016to be fair x is twice as powerful as A9True, by its also considerably less powerful than rival devices of which it is currently more expensive.
I keep saying that at £400 or less this could be considered the recommended device for the category.
At its current price...it's a Plain rip off
- AnonD-527105
- IWc
AnonD-531620, 20 May 2016Do Sony pay any attention to their rivals, as the review says HTC released the A9, a good look... moreto be fair x is twice as powerful as A9
- AnonD-531620
- 3JY
Do Sony pay any attention to their rivals, as the review says HTC released the A9, a good looking midrange handset but with a poor chip set and awful battery . It was slated by reviewers, mainly because of its premium price tag. Sony has just made a huge blunder, no need to buy this handset, much better devices available that are less expensive.
- AnonD-79898
- sbS
This phone has mediocre battery life, a horrible DAC, and no video recording higher than full HD ...
Reminds me of midrange devices from 2012, terrible phone.
- vrvly
- g5f
X for grass. (I was thinking that it's just minor problem, but after looking on X and other X(Force), it's just painful to watch)
- Lex79
- LhN
Price is this device's biggest obstacle. At £400 it would be a pretty solid bet.
At its current price though, it simply is not value for money.
And it seem that whilst Sony are constantly improving, the camera department still has a ways to go.
- Beyond
- RIE
Sorry Xperia X, you are not cup of my tea anymore.
-Reboot if unplug SIM Tray
-Loudspeaker is the worst (too low volume than Z5/M5)
-Camera noise once again and always the worst panorama ever
-Battery life, the most hopeless
- Wrong
- pEA
viveksubhash, 20 May 2016the unnamed glass cover is a pain....and if i remember m5 had waterproof rating...so its a dow... moreSony mobile and sony camera are two totally different business. Just because its same name doeant mean anything. So sony mobile is just another customer like samsung htc etc.
- AnonD-404798
- d%{
I'm not satisfied with review completely because more important devices( like G5,S7,HTC10,A7 and A9 ) should been thrown in those benchmarks charts for chipset performance and battery life ...that would be a good way to see is the X worth the money Sony asks for it or not .
For anybody who is interested to get Xperia phone because of the benefits that Sony brings should go with Z5 that costs $460 and is much better device if the one doesn't mind having phone bit older phone from late 2015 .
Overall Xperia X is outstanding high end midranger and really impressive - only issue that is a bit to expensive , should be in price range 450-550$ and not 550-650$ that is too much and overpriced...
- viveksubhash
- X$6
the unnamed glass cover is a pain....and if i remember m5 had waterproof rating...so its a downgrade successor at best...and whats the use of a good camera if it can't beat the oems using sony's own sensors?? someome's sleeping on their jobs....really would have like to go for a sony but the price-feature-security-repairablity is not the best in class
Tip us
881k
145k 87k
558k
RSS
Log in I forgot my password Sign up