When do we expect to read review of J7-2016 (and G4 plus)? Would be interesting to find out if that cell phone has the same pathetic battery life for video playback as this one.
Grey1213, 26 May 2016They do mention android 6.0, in the intro and in the ui. I presume the spec sheet is outdated.Yeah but they took so soft on this phone, it look likes they done it intentionaly to reduce the pressure on this phone, as you said space of this phone is dissapointig
man of war, 26 May 2016One question for gsmarena, why you guys didnt mention lack of andriod 6 as a negative part,bec... moreThey do mention android 6.0, in the intro and in the ui. I presume the spec sheet is outdated.
Its ironic samsung still manage to stay on top even with these crap smartphones launched. Old android version, minimum sensors, boring design , lack of features and a total waste of 180$.
One question for gsmarena, why you guys didnt mention lack of andriod 6 as a negative part,because its really a shame for the samsung to relase a phone now with andriod 5, it is a derict insult. J5 2015 never get marshmallow(like many other samsung phones),and how are the chances of this phone to get 6????? And as everyone know samsung upgrades most of the time destroy lower models,with out any change
Something is wrong with the battery testing procedure. There is no way that the endurance rating and the video playback time are that much low. Given the fact that J5 2015 had an amazing battery life with 2600 mah having almost the same specs.
Dear GSMArena, you quotes what DeltaE 2000 deviation is so here's a question - what's DeltaE deviation for Samsung J5 2016?
[deleted post]Exactly, And you can buy a xiaomi redmi 3 or note 3 at cheaper price.
Browndynamite, 25 May 2016Chipset is bad .Other than that ,it's cool .Got a nice battery too But it needs better optimisation
Chipset is bad .Other than that ,it's cool .Got a nice battery too