Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) review Comments

• AnonD-541536
• f}Z
• 26 May 2016

Its ironic samsung still manage to stay on top even with these crap smartphones launched. Old android version, minimum sensors, boring design , lack of features and a total waste of 180$.

• Rating2 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-237389
• HIJ
• 26 May 2016

One question for gsmarena, why you guys didnt mention lack of andriod 6 as a negative part,because its really a shame for the samsung to relase a phone now with andriod 5, it is a derict insult. J5 2015 never get marshmallow(like many other samsung phones),and how are the chances of this phone to get 6????? And as everyone know samsung upgrades most of the time destroy lower models,with out any change

• Rating2 |
• Reply
• Report

• TechGeeky
• vTQ
• 26 May 2016

Something is wrong with the battery testing procedure. There is no way that the endurance rating and the video playback time are that much low. Given the fact that J5 2015 had an amazing battery life with 2600 mah having almost the same specs.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• nick
• pWY
• 26 May 2016

Dear GSMArena, you quotes what DeltaE 2000 deviation is so here's a question - what's DeltaE deviation for Samsung J5 2016?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Razor
• K2E
• 26 May 2016

[deleted post]Exactly, And you can buy a xiaomi redmi 3 or note 3 at cheaper price.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-537930
• bE8
• 25 May 2016

AnonD-537930, 25 May 2016Chipset is bad .Other than that ,it's cool .Got a nice battery too But it needs better optimisation

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-537930
• bE8
• 25 May 2016

Chipset is bad .Other than that ,it's cool .Got a nice battery too

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• ithehappy
• gwB
• 25 May 2016

What a meaningless device Samsung, kudos.

• Rating3 |
• Reply
• Report