AnonD-476243, 22 Sep 2016Who will buy these expensive phone, while values ​​below 200 dollars we ca... moreWho will buy it? Those who can...
I buy one cause I can afford one and I want one...
AnonD-442781, 22 Sep 2016Exactly. The iPhone 7 doesn't even have a second sim slot, and yet not being able to use a sec... moreStill doesnt explain your point of saying how those disadvantages of absent features apply on the iphone. And if you just check out the actual review of iphone 7, it mentioned no micro sd slot as a disadvantage.
pt020, 22 Sep 2016Apple? no thank you. In 4 days I have will have my Xperia xz ... Your plastic bezels phone hahaha pathetic :)
"The low-light sample is really impressive - it was shot at ISO 100 at 1/6 speed and illustrates the true power of an OIS camera."
Is it just me or the iPhone 7 has pathetic IQ compared to Nexus 5X? Why call it impressive?
amasing chipset !! wow that s great ! but ios!!!! no not more . i will choose between xperia xz or galaxy note 7 or maybe oneplus 3 . iphone 7 is great but ios is a jail!
Anonymous, 20 Sep 2016Wow!!!. .. Worse battery life than Iphone 6s !!! .. Worse video playing time. Worse Inter... moreSo you didn't read the article that said they have a new testing procedure with 25% more brightness. You just made yourself look so silly
So no fast wireless charging is a shame in 2016? Only because Samsung has it. Did you thought about the fact that all other big companies don't like Sony, HTC, Google, OnePlus etc. don't have it and that the iPhone has a metal back compared to the Glass back of the S6/S7 which makes it able for wireless charging way easier?
Where is 7 Plus Review. I just want to see how the dual camera performs. And. Does that 3 GB RAM makes a difference or not between 7& 7+.
Anonymous, 22 Sep 2016I had an iPhone 3G, a 4S and a 5. I kept the 5 for about a year and a half, the other two less... moreThats how smart people will buy a smartphone ( with the lowest price to get the best, instead of the reverse iphoen 7 ) :D
Anonymous, 22 Sep 2016I had an iPhone 3G, a 4S and a 5. I kept the 5 for about a year and a half, the other two less... moreWho will buy these expensive phone, while values ​​below 200 dollars we can get a much more attractive design, superior chipset, os were very friendly, great battery with fast charging too
I had an iPhone 3G, a 4S and a 5. I kept the 5 for about a year and a half, the other two less than a year. They were nice phones at the time, when everyone else was behind. While the 3G came to light, all Android phones were horrible. Then the iOS 4 update came and broke it. The Galaxy S line started with the iPhone 4, they were good phones, but with bad plastic build, while Android and TouchWiz had a lot of issues (TouchWiz might be improved now, but we still hate it though.) Since the iPhone 6, Apple has been behind the competition in every aspect. Design, battery life, camera/sound/display quality, as well as other features and so on. Android has came a long way, now being comparable to iOS - performance and stability wise. Of course, an iPhone 7 might be a few miliseconds faster than the best Androids out there (let's say the OnePlus 3), but that's just no justification to double the price AND have half the storage. And that with worse, overused (by more than 2 years) design, IMHO, not to mention the huge bezels (seriously, Apple, isn't a 5.5 inch phone already big enough?) To me, that 32-128-256 storage option is a scam, making you buy the 2nd one. There should be 1-step increase in storage, so the 7s should have been started with 64 gig options. A premium phone in 2016 should have no less than 64GB, look at the OnePlus 3 and Note7 (explosions aside). Also, let's not forget that a premium glossy black piano won't scrath if you touch it. That's how a quality device should act.
Duel, 22 Sep 2016It's just stand by time, you get avarege 8 hour screen time with that battery, so it's not bad... moreFor me, anything above the 50h mark is already acceptable. But coming from Lumia 1520 with 107h mark going to an iPhone 6s Plus (85h) battery is no longer noticeable...
Vineeth , 22 Sep 2016I was under the impression that LeeEco was the first one to come with phones without the 3.5mm... moreLeEco announced it this month while Motorola Moto Z is already available now...
Krille, 22 Sep 2016Haha, EPIC fail with that lousy battery performance. I should definitely have been above 70 hr... moreIt's just stand by time, you get avarege 8 hour screen time with that battery, so it's not bad at all
I was under the impression that LeeEco was the first one to come with phones without the 3.5mm headphone jack?!!!!