Anonymous, 20 Sep 2016Wow!!!. .. Worse battery life than Iphone 6s !!! .. Worse video playing time. Worse Inter... moreSo you didn't read the article that said they have a new testing procedure with 25% more brightness. You just made yourself look so silly
So no fast wireless charging is a shame in 2016? Only because Samsung has it. Did you thought about the fact that all other big companies don't like Sony, HTC, Google, OnePlus etc. don't have it and that the iPhone has a metal back compared to the Glass back of the S6/S7 which makes it able for wireless charging way easier?
Where is 7 Plus Review. I just want to see how the dual camera performs. And. Does that 3 GB RAM makes a difference or not between 7& 7+.
Anonymous, 22 Sep 2016I had an iPhone 3G, a 4S and a 5. I kept the 5 for about a year and a half, the other two less... moreThats how smart people will buy a smartphone ( with the lowest price to get the best, instead of the reverse iphoen 7 ) :D
Anonymous, 22 Sep 2016I had an iPhone 3G, a 4S and a 5. I kept the 5 for about a year and a half, the other two less... moreWho will buy these expensive phone, while values ​​below 200 dollars we can get a much more attractive design, superior chipset, os were very friendly, great battery with fast charging too
I had an iPhone 3G, a 4S and a 5. I kept the 5 for about a year and a half, the other two less than a year. They were nice phones at the time, when everyone else was behind. While the 3G came to light, all Android phones were horrible. Then the iOS 4 update came and broke it. The Galaxy S line started with the iPhone 4, they were good phones, but with bad plastic build, while Android and TouchWiz had a lot of issues (TouchWiz might be improved now, but we still hate it though.) Since the iPhone 6, Apple has been behind the competition in every aspect. Design, battery life, camera/sound/display quality, as well as other features and so on. Android has came a long way, now being comparable to iOS - performance and stability wise. Of course, an iPhone 7 might be a few miliseconds faster than the best Androids out there (let's say the OnePlus 3), but that's just no justification to double the price AND have half the storage. And that with worse, overused (by more than 2 years) design, IMHO, not to mention the huge bezels (seriously, Apple, isn't a 5.5 inch phone already big enough?) To me, that 32-128-256 storage option is a scam, making you buy the 2nd one. There should be 1-step increase in storage, so the 7s should have been started with 64 gig options. A premium phone in 2016 should have no less than 64GB, look at the OnePlus 3 and Note7 (explosions aside). Also, let's not forget that a premium glossy black piano won't scrath if you touch it. That's how a quality device should act.
Duel, 22 Sep 2016It's just stand by time, you get avarege 8 hour screen time with that battery, so it's not bad... moreFor me, anything above the 50h mark is already acceptable. But coming from Lumia 1520 with 107h mark going to an iPhone 6s Plus (85h) battery is no longer noticeable...
Vineeth , 22 Sep 2016I was under the impression that LeeEco was the first one to come with phones without the 3.5mm... moreLeEco announced it this month while Motorola Moto Z is already available now...
Krille, 22 Sep 2016Haha, EPIC fail with that lousy battery performance. I should definitely have been above 70 hr... moreIt's just stand by time, you get avarege 8 hour screen time with that battery, so it's not bad at all
I was under the impression that LeeEco was the first one to come with phones without the 3.5mm headphone jack?!!!!
Wxy, 22 Sep 2016Some people pick a brand as their standard because of their personal preference... other peopl... moreI just wanted to assert that the iphone 7 really dont nice phone, you know that 5.5-inch screen with full HD resolution now even too small for me
Haha, EPIC fail with that lousy battery performance. I should definitely have been above 70 hrs. Anything worse than Samsung S7 (76 hrs) in the battery performance, is actually very bad. The S7 is juuuust acceptable in terms of battery, (When most shit is turned off) but its not a very good flagship overall TBH. Even the Sony xperia X compact did significantly better with its 73 hrs.
rivaldi zo, 22 Sep 2016Do you mean that the phone is expensive should have very standard 4.7-inch display :D Some people pick a brand as their standard because of their personal preference... other people picked on other people's brand because they think that brand is too expensive and can be replaced by a less expensive but more capable product... Lets say a polo... I prefer Lacoste as a brand of Polo. I pay hundred of bucks for one. Others will say, you can get a much better polo with a high quality fabrics at a lower price in lets say GAP...
Then I will say, that's your standard not mine...
Wxy, 22 Sep 2016As I said... if that is your standard... then stick to it... :) Liking a product is a perso... moreDo you mean that the phone is expensive should have very standard 4.7-inch display :D
rivaldi zo, 22 Sep 2016Really, for that price iphone 7 should have a tough battery - with fast charging too, full hd ... moreAs I said... if that is your standard... then stick to it... :)
Liking a product is a personal choice...
I just really fed up with that 4.7 inches and that prices of shit is really expensive haha
Wxy, 22 Sep 2016LOL... If that is your standard... why not...Really, for that price iphone 7 should have a tough battery - with fast charging too, full hd screen at least 5 inches upward, design are completely have new
My last iphone was the 4S. I was thinking the 7 would be the one that brings be back to iOS, and was kind of hoping it would. The design is nice.. not fixing what ain't broke. The look of the jet black is stunning. But the lack of a 3.5mm jack? Apple likes contraversy? Well, I won't be buying an iphone as a result of it. How's that for contraversy!