People are Goin crazy for thus Sony cell!!
Anonymous, 04 Oct 2016A design made for 40+ people? That's the biggest BS I've ever read..he is right this design is very luxury and don't attract the young girls that hug their tedy bears when sleep and boys that have a collection off pokemon and starwars logoBased in their dresser . its desing is good for managers topEnginers professors masters and reach puple and government !! this design is for top people that can't anyone percept it.
Anonymous, 04 Oct 2016Design is very luxury and future proof it is not suitable for childish taste from this days . ... moreand with the current design, many many young people will avoid it.
this phone is really really targetted for elder people (above 40 years old). lol.
Design is very luxury and future proof it is not suitable for childish taste from this days . Younger people choose juvenile design and infantaile and coloured GUI like miui and lg and even samsung . For example in older days sony design experia z2 and z3 that competitor of them galaxy s5!! in this time you can look at xperia z3 and xperia z2 and you say wow they are awesome and beautiful after these years but when look at galaxy s5 you want to evacuation your stomach fast as you can in nearest wc. But galaxy s5 sold very well and more than both z3 and z2 and people on that days had this opinion that galaxy s5 is awesome with better design ! Most of the Smartphone buyers is teenagers and young people that in this days untill 40 years old you can address them, children !! sony must start a new design for add more purchaser.
Anonymous, 04 Oct 2016look at those combinations. the long circle below the camera (i know there are 2 sensors + 1 l... moreYeah.. the camera lens and the laser sensor and the RGBC-IR sensor and the led light looks like a drop of crystal faberge , it seems like bullying by her competitors.
Anonymous, 04 Oct 2016Design may not suite everyone's taste, not just for XZ, but also for other phones.
Most peopl... morelook at those combinations. the long circle below the camera (i know there are 2 sensors + 1 led flash there, that's why it looks too tall). and combined with the sharp cornered body shape. it just looks weird.
but this is just my personal opinion ;-)
Anonymous, 04 Oct 2016indeed. their design is always boooooriinng. for example look at the camera and flash light sh... moreDesign may not suite everyone's taste, not just for XZ, but also for other phones.
Most people including me find the XZ look premium and stylish.
I dont see whats wrong with the camera placement. Some other phones have the cameras placed at the left corner too.
Pan , 04 Oct 2016Boring, the only thing Sony can Do to distinguish From competitors is to sell it cheap.indeed. their design is always boooooriinng. for example look at the camera and flash light shapes and placement on the back, it looks weird.
Boring, the only thing Sony can Do to distinguish From competitors is to sell it cheap.
wow most review comments forever !!!!
Not being an ideal machine, XZ does have a wow-factor! It just looks so good, me likes the exterior.
AnonD-442781, 30 Sep 2016I see you're making stuff up again. Why not produce a link that shows it fixes the problems la... moreme, im going to support him because he is my brother and I understand the way he think, broter tan I understand u love u brother.
Egan, man. You had a high definition audio player in your hands (Minimum price $300) and you hardly paid any attention to that fact. Where's your priorities, man?
AnonD-442781, 03 Oct 2016LOL. Just because they give numbers and use an algorithm it doesn't mean it is objective. The ... moreandroid plice?! lll .. it is one of the bad tech sites in world .. their site is full of gough...
Best phone in world ..
Tann Hauser, 03 Oct 2016Dummy, how exactly is dxomark in any way subjective?
Its a program with algorithms measuring ... moreLOL. Just because they give numbers and use an algorithm it doesn't mean it is objective. The algorithm was created by someone who has to subjectively determine things, and then determine how they want to weight things. It is different from an objective test of how accurate a display is to a certain standard, the standard that most video content follows. In this case dxomark is its own standard, and that is of course not an objective matter.
Here are some more reasons to be sceptical:
AnonD-442781, 03 Oct 2016How is it objective though? It is still subjective. Unlike testing display colour accuracy. I ... moreDummy, how exactly is dxomark in any way subjective?
Its a program with algorithms measuring points on a scale of 100 for certain camera factors.
Youre waaay too off the field.
[deleted post]How is it objective though? It is still subjective. Unlike testing display colour accuracy. I don't know why you mention dxomark, last time I saw you mention them you were saying the xz got 95. Lol.