hey pips its up to you if wnt k3 no one force you to buy it nd motorola is nice phone in everyway i thnk k3 is cheaper than v6 maxx
For me I was like those people who rate phones by the camera and other function.
But now, i'm more on style. and for me, u don't need that Nokia 80 series phones. That's really expensive and has less features. Just go on motorola KRZR or RAZR phones.
Well, i like K3. Because it's small than the RAZRs.
let me tell you kids some thing,
i have the K3 , i also have a samsung U700 and the k3 IS the better of the two!!!!!!!!!!!
Samsung is plastic crap from the east.
No 3G? What is the HSDPA then?
FYI, tht is 3.5G which is even faster than normal 3G if u didnt know
N some of the people really rate a phone based on megapixel of the camera,eh?
again and again. what a boring razr design. no 3G... no FM radio... only 2 MP camera and no auto-focus while others have gone 3,2 MP even 5 MP with autofocus... hey we're not only talking about the looks here but also about the technology. see, it's not astonishing why samsung has taken motorola's place hahaha. motorola is regretable indeed !!! all they can do is just replicate and replicate...
To me all SE phones look identical and boring.. Of course talking between candybar models... K series, W series.. all the same.
But it's not bashing what I mean, it's to make a point that this is Motorola's thing.. do razrs... So please stop complaining about it. Besides it is NOT true that all motorolas are RAZRs, v3 and v3i are much alike.. of course v3i looks far better, so it was an improvement. V3x was nothing like v3, except it was "thin" and with a "chin" but not the same. V3xx is bigger, v6 is again totally different, and the K series are smaller with the only similitude being the chin and the thin profile.
So either you get it right or you go back to kindergarden to lear the difference between "the same" and "not the same"
This phone is amazing, enough said. Also it is an evolution from the v3 series, and even the k1 phone. Just try it out. Of course the still screenshots look the same for all Motos, it's the menu handling what counts. Should I be correct if I say ALL symbians are the same? Of course not, but that's the impression I'd get after seeing the same screenshots over different phone models. Same happens here.. it gives the impression of being just like a v3, but trust me it is not.
Let me explain it for u regarding ur so-called conspiracy.
The review for SE T650 is done by GSMArena team but the review for this K3 is done by MobileMania.
GSMArena use the word 'ancient' for all the review they've done but MobileMania do not use tht word.
Make sense now?
Beside,as long as we're informed on the vid resolution is enough, whether they put the extra 'ancient' word or not does not really matter isn't it?
I'm from Portugal and my carrier is TMN. I've changed my unlocked blue K1 for a locked K3 when it came out. Took it back after 3 weeks. Awful thing! I got the maxx instead. It is much cheaper now and what a great phone!!!
this phone sucks anyway.
pretty faces are not everything motorola
its time you bring a phone with brains.
i saw the "ancient" word on T650 and U600 reviews, but here in motorola's old narrow razr clone review i didn't saw it. same as thre Nokia 6300 review. feels like GSMArena has some conspiracy with Nokia and Motorola :(
In the end were question= Whitch one you take? KRZR K3 or RAZR maxx V6. I definitely take RAZR maxx V6, becouse it has better look and bigger screen.
Motorola as got to get away from this Razor mobile line up now,ok it look promising when the started but never seem impress alot people because the First one let alot of people down,Bluetooth to slow no memory card an rubbish camera it might have attract people because its thinnest but that was the only good thing about it,Motorola report loses but keep doing it razor mobiles but WHY? to me there a waste of money