Meizu M3 Max review Comments

• Ab9
• fCF
• 16 Dec 2016

New format is good but I wish you had covered 360° view , sunlight test and audio output(need).

• Reply

• UnbreakableAli
• mJR
• 16 Dec 2016

I loved the shorter review version , but 2 things are missing and shouldn't be compromised , the video samples and the full benchmark tests

• Reply

• Audio part?
• Sf{
• 16 Dec 2016

Audio test is missing from the test is unacceptable. Please also test the output voltage as well (low, moderate, high doesn't give enough idea and we still connect to the other site to see output voltage only).

• Reply

• EverythingSamsungPro
• uRG
• 16 Dec 2016

Nope I am not a fan of such condensed reviews. I used to LOVE and enjoy reading long reviews on gsmarena. I was really shocked when I read the short review of the Lenovo Phab 2 plus. Go back to the original long style for all phone reviews, please! My number one wish... :-)

• Reply

• AnonD-621322
• rX}
• 16 Dec 2016

I dig your in-depth reviews, but I think this review format is good for entry level to lower-tier, mid-level phones.

• Reply

• AnonD-621313
• XMp
• 16 Dec 2016

Nope, I don't like this way of you people reviewing the phones.
It's more congested, the previous way of reviewing was much better.
I suggest you to change it back to the former style.

• Reply

• Alex
• T3X
• 16 Dec 2016

Please check phones for LTE band 20 support.
It is very important thing for Europe, influencing buying decision.

• Reply

• Anonymous
• IVE
• 16 Dec 2016

Yogesh, 16 Dec 2016After sale service is very poor no service station in delhiI'll ensure you it goes the same to the rest of the world regarding its service quality except in China.

• Reply

• Yogesh
• gNZ
• 16 Dec 2016

After sale service is very poor no service station in delhi

• Reply

• AnonD-614406
• sAI
• 16 Dec 2016

Android - Prime, 16 Dec 2016I prefer long and detailed review, so the readers can grasp much more information about the de... moreExcel in battery.

• Reply

• Cater Joey
• sAI
• 16 Dec 2016

Best battery phone! fastest charge and very less power consuming device ever.

• Reply

• AnonD-43988
• KAf
• 16 Dec 2016

I like this approach: Detailed reviews for a few flagship/upper-midrange devices and short reviews for the other devices.

• Reply

• Pinkhlemet
• D01
• 16 Dec 2016

Good. This kind of review for are OK from time to time. Finally you can put up reviews faster and not after 3-5 months after the phone releases. Do push reviews faster please.

• Reply

• Piku
• gML
• 16 Dec 2016

I Love Meizu for designs but they need to select good processor for their phones and better camera sensors.

• Reply

• hrishievo
• PBx
• 16 Dec 2016

Include audio quality and sunlight legibility tests. Also, a review on touch response times, if possible (on longer reviews as well) would be helpful.

• Reply

• AnonD-595888
• t7X
• 16 Dec 2016

Gsmarena, you should distinguish your shorter format reviews to the longer ones. Just add a tag or flair to them, so readers will be know.

• Reply

• Anonymous
• vV5
• 16 Dec 2016

Good review. Short and simple. Keep it up GSMArena

• Reply

• Anonymous
• u42
• 16 Dec 2016

Good battery life.

• Reply

• Veer
• yZu
• 16 Dec 2016

One thing is very important, the display test. I think you should use table system for the display test results to have an easy look.

• Reply

• Redmi user
• Ki@
• 16 Dec 2016

At first I thought that this is preview.
But, really a review.
For a budget and mid-range, this review is enough for us.
But for a Flagship, Show us the long review.
So, No problemo.

• Reply