The short format review is good enough for the mid range phone that almost the same from every manufacturer. Just highlight a few different factors are enough. So that GSMA can post the review on more devices than today.
However, I just want to let you know that your review is the best on the cyber especially the camera compare tool. Thanks for doing a great product like this. I use it as an important factors to buy the phone for the past years.
I prefer long and detailed review, so the readers can grasp much more information about the device (what the device excels at, in comparison to other devices with the same price range or performance)
apertotes, 16 Dec 2016I do like the shorter format, but I miss a few tests like sunlight legibility and audio qualit... moreActually the sunlight legibility is measured and mentioned in the display paragraphs. There is no chart though.
And yes, this type of short reviews is purely experimental, and if it sticks, it will be only for budget, unpopular, or a few months old devices.
If with some short reviews we are gonna see some more phones reviewed then fine by me. But your long reviews are the best on the net.
I hate this model of reviewing , previous model was perfect and i always read every word of those reviews.
Pages are much but details are ..
Now , pages are less and details .. wait, details ?!
As a first move , i always check the battery page , where is it ???
No , no , and hell no , this model of reviewing isnt what GSMARENA should do, why u r going to be PA ???
USE THIS MODEL OF REVIEWING FOR LOW-END PHONES NOT EVEN MID TO HIGH ONES !
I do like the shorter format, but I miss a few tests like sunlight legibility and audio quality.
Way to go!
I actually like this kind of review.
Only things i would also like to see that are not always there:
earpiece and mouthpiece quality,
whether the phone has a notification light or not,
can properly run a heavy game or not
it doesn't seem a proper review...where are the negative sides? Too few pages also
I think this was a preview and not a proper review.... probably some title mistake or something.
I like this review format. Up to the point and still packing all the necessary details. Thank you for figuring this out.
I like it but not so for popular mobiles.I need detailed review for popular phones.
I like this kind for low or mid end, is pretty good for them. But for flagships, please, keep the usual =]