Anonymous, 22 Jan 2017Sad that in 2017 my 2014 Galaxy S5 is still faster, has a better screen, lasts longer with a s... moreTrue, S5 was one of Samsung's best yet under-appreciated smartphone. Still very good to use as a daily driver.
Obi Wan Kenobi, 15 Jan 2017A very poor battery life result, especially for a Motorola. This Moto M manages 55 hours with... moreYeps, Mediatek SoC's are crap. Yet more and more known brands are beginning to use them because they are cheap. It's the beginning of the end for Android. The OS started to sick after KitKat and now the hardware as well. Time to leave the sinking ship.
Sad that in 2017 my 2014 Galaxy S5 is still faster, has a better screen, lasts longer with a smaller battery, is louder and has more features (NFC & IR-blaster)
I'll bet that it has better WiFi and cellular reception too?
I sure hope that after MWC midrange offerings improve otherwise I'm stuck on this S5 forever. Perhaps the S5 is indeed the last best Samsung phone...hmmm.
Only 10 day replacement from shite Flipkart,it should be Amazon purchases this product they make our value of 18 k
No notification pulse light,no selfey camera light with 17999 k !!!! Today every selfie lover want this feature... Other features are ok. With this price Vivo v 5 is good,When MOTO M available with gray colour ????
Any Mediatek powered smartphone should be given for free because it's a horrendous chipset. Hats off to any manufacturer staying away from these processors from Mediatek.
Anonymous, 15 Jan 2017Didn't surprise me, after Moto G 4 and Moto E 3rd you saw that it's a Lenovo phone with a diff... moreYeah, but the same Lenovo did get many things right with the Moto Z Force. Amazing battery life and a decent implementation of modularity (& way better thought-of than G5's). Too bad they removed the 3.5mm jack though, hopefully they'll revert next time!
logan, 15 Jan 2017bettry Life is Good in MoToYeah, exactly my point. Moto's generally have good battery endurance, but this Moto M is the ugly duckling!
Obi Wan Kenobi, 15 Jan 2017A very poor battery life result, especially for a Motorola.
This Moto M manages 55 hours with... moreDidn't surprise me, after Moto G 4 and Moto E 3rd you saw that it's a Lenovo phone with a different name.
So sad, Motorola was great years ago now it's just a name.
A very poor battery life result, especially for a Motorola.
This Moto M manages 55 hours with a 3050mAh and "just" a 5.5 inch 1080p screen.
The Moto ZForce gets 88 hours with a 3500mAh and a 5.5 inch 1440p screen.
The Moto ZPlay can do 100 hours with 3510mAh and a 5.5 inch 1080p screen.
I guess it is safe to point fingers at the MediaTek Helip P10 chipset.
xeroxxxxxxxxx, 14 Jan 2017Looks like when lenovo bought Motorola , Motorola already dead . Now it is same like others Ch... moreits totally Wrong. Moto is a Brand and its Famous For Own Quality and Features And Lenovo has Also Good Brand Value
Motorola is the best bargain in the cell phone industry. Walk in buy a phone for 199.00 and it lasts longer and same specs as all the top of the line aluminum phones. Can anyone make an argument for value?
An uninspiring review. Seems like the "meh" feeling of the smartphone was transfered to the way the review was written