Samsung Galaxy A3 (2017) review Comments

• PLAYER SLAYER
• r2j
• 16 Jan 2017

I like how these specs still compete with the iPhone 7, despite being hundreds of dollars less

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• no
• 0Qc
• 16 Jan 2017

AnonD-237389, 16 Jan 2017Xperia x compact crashed it.Nope

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Jason Melling
• 7vc
• 16 Jan 2017

Same-sung has been releasing the same phine over and over again, this is identical to every other phone.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Vic
• 35j
• 16 Jan 2017

Dear GSMarena, please always provide information about battery stand-by endurance. It's an important information for some people when purchasing a new phone. Also, excellent endurance numbers calculated from long video playback and browsing are quite worthless for busy people or those who don't use their smarpthones much and don't want to charge device every or every second day.
I'd very much appreciate if you could develop methodology of calculating and comparing of stand-by endurance, rather that just saying that stand-by was good, bad or average.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Sebstin
• kmM
• 16 Jan 2017

Why its not being released in US?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-237389
• HIJ
• 16 Jan 2017

Xperia x compact crashed it.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 6vU
• 16 Jan 2017

Very good info. Thank you so much,when this phone reachs Middel east please?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

34295396

• Obi Wan Kenobi
• 3Yg
• 16 Jan 2017

Another solid battery life result from Samsung. I have to say the A3 (2017) is a very refreshing mini-phone in a world littered with 5+ inch midrangers.

But on that note, I really do hope Samsung revives it's S-mini flagship range. We haven't had any since S5 mini.

• Rating3 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-380093
• 00d
• 16 Jan 2017

That very very good battery life is more than that. It will promise no thermal heating and good performance and overall experience. Good job.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-483081
• x86
• 16 Jan 2017

If it didn't have the name on the front I would have recommended it to everyone.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-245620
• a4j
• 16 Jan 2017

Who the hell mid-range smartphone have incredible battery life vs top-end devices .

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Lead2XL
• q}j
• 16 Jan 2017

Amazing battery life with such a small battery, according to your tests, which I check regularly by the way. You mention the Xiaomi Redmi 4 Prime. I wanted to try a smaller, budget phone so I went for the Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime over the Redmi 4, which weighs a heavy 156 grams compared to the 3S at only 144 grams. The weight of the Redmi 4 makes it less than compact in my view. The Redmi 3S Prime also comes in a Global ROM version with many more LTE bands than the Redmi 4 Prime. Oddly the underspecced Redmi 4A does have a global ROM version but not the regular 4 or Prime, not as yet anyway.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Avi
• ITm
• 16 Jan 2017

Insane battery life for very small capacity.. kudo's Samsung.. I'm getting it.. come to India soon

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• No Matter
• niH
• 16 Jan 2017

Well samsung internal amplifiers are worst thing if you are music listerner. Ok, if you listen at flat EQ setting, which never suits music gourmand. But if you try to raise bass or high tones levels, everything else drops to useless levels.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report