GSMArena.com GSMArena.com

Tip us

883k

142k
87k
355k

RSS

Log in

Login with
Facebook Google

Sign up
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • FeaturedNew
  • Phone Finder
  • Tools
  • Glossary
  • Coverage
  • FAQ
  • Contact
Samsung Galaxy S9 review
  • -
  • -
  • -
GSMArena team, 07 February 2017

Our mobile chipset guide Comments

  • Read
  • Comments (184)

  • Post your comment
Pages: 1 23…910 »
Sort by:

t91
  • teleduardo11
  • Pw30
  • 31 Jan 2018

Please make the update as promised. Congratulations for this very useful information. Suggetstion: Getting one way to compare with the Apple Chipsets too.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
D
  • Denes
  • M{jm
  • 01 Dec 2017

You guys promised to keep it updated - in the article. We would really appreciate an update as dozens of chipsets have been released meantime.

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • PUn1
  • 14 Sep 2017

Time to get it updated cause there has been a few new chips introduced in the market.

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
u
  • unknown
  • XLEm
  • 08 Aug 2017

Firstly, great article. Very informative. Secondly, can you guys do a gpu comparison as well?

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
H
  • HHH
  • 7tWM
  • 02 Aug 2017

Good article... helps on deciding the phones.

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
W273
  • WirelessWonkFL
  • Qaa7
  • 01 Aug 2017

You neglected to include Mediatek MT6757 (Helio P20)

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • nmMe
  • 15 Jul 2017

A great article for quick comparison of different chipsets. Keep up the good work!

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
K
  • Kam
  • vx6d
  • 02 Jul 2017

still going back over and over again on this article!!!! ^_^

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
X11
  • Xpress72
  • LC5M
  • 30 Jun 2017

I would like to see updated

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
P11
  • Praveen Mcp
  • D0e2
  • 27 Jun 2017

Fabulous article...Ty team gsmarena!!!

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • uS6C
  • 08 Jun 2017

Wow!! Excellent article.
Please include some information about Apple chip-sets too.
Thank you.

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
G
  • Grg
  • MDVk
  • 07 Jun 2017

Any update for this article? Specially the 4th part and the comparison with all the chip-sets since we got the new snapdragon and the new Helio.

Thank you for a wonderful job!

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
t91
  • teleduardo11
  • 85ME
  • 24 Apr 2017

May you please update this clever article with the new chipsets on the market? Why not try some way to include the Apple chipsets too? It would be fair for users to know very well all options.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
H1
  • HMD2017
  • Yanx
  • 13 Mar 2017

Anonymous, 09 Feb 2017Actually Apple can do that (it's closer to 3:1 rather than 6:1 memory wise) because they cheat... moreyes

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
M
  • Mohole U R
  • fCRa
  • 01 Mar 2017

Excellent technicaltour guiding layman like me into the dynamics and a bit of architecture in the making/development of SoC.
By the way what ARM stands for?

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
G13418
  • GadgetZonePH
  • Q5iD
  • 24 Feb 2017

Eyzerman, 12 Feb 2017Why are iPhone processors not included... Is it coz people would realize how far ahead apples ... moreBecause Android chipsets are the only one that can do "multi-tasking" not more like with Apple Chipsets, it's fast because regardless if an Apple-user would open lots of applications on their phone, Apple just concentrates onto the one that's active; it stops the operations of the other apps. Simple it is. :-)

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
G13418
  • GadgetZonePH
  • Q5iD
  • 24 Feb 2017

All of the mobile chipsets has their own "opportunities" regarding on their make/model. However, it is not always the manufacturer's fault if the devices did not met your satisfactions. You can't blame them. Why? They are not the ones who are using the mobile device. Always, the device is their concern, but how we use it is not. Again, "it always depends on how you will be using the device; not about its make."

If you're into picture-taking or cameras, choose a chipset that would truly meet that expectation. If you're a heavy-gamer, choose a chipset that would be fitted for a gamer. If you're into an office-phone, choose a chipset fitted for a total multi-tasking.

Do not always compare "flagship" to "semi mid-range" to "mid-range" and so on. They have their own uses that's why they also belong to different categories depending on the consumers' use. What's wrong about this, is that, we consumers are buying devices by their looks but doesn't have any total idea regarding it's internal specs. Whew!

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
B
  • Biggles
  • xKYM
  • 21 Feb 2017

I have to say this is one of the best articles you guys have ever done and one of the most useful by far. Whilst most people like flagship devices with flagship processors, the economic reality around the world is that not everybody can own a device rocking a Snapdragon 820. Given that over the last few years, the old high-end is now only comparable with the last year's mid-range and this year's low-end, this article is invaluable in figuring out what roughly compares to what.

The Snapdragon 800 in the Note 10.1" 2014 was probably the first CPU that I thought was "fast enough". I no longer have that device, so perhaps in the years since I'd have found it slow - but the Snapdragon 805 in my Note 4 which I use daily is definitely "fast enough". The tables in this article makes me realise that in all likelihood, the Snapdragon 430 in the Nokia 6 will be perfectly reasonable for most people. Being able to look and know what to expect from a cheap tablet with a Mediatek CPU (much better than I expected now!) is a great thing.

I would ask that you continue to update this article. Don't give it a date and make it something that becomes less relevant, but rather add new chips to it as you come across them, flesh out the gaps (Intel Atoms, Rockchips perhaps?) and keep it useful.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
e491
  • elr
  • Kg{i
  • 20 Feb 2017

What is better overall, Kirin 935 or Kirin 655?

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
V53
  • Vinodh3
  • utIZ
  • 20 Feb 2017

consumersmartphone, 16 Feb 2017How Sammy phone will get higher score. >> In multi core: SD625 is better when it point t... moreSome manufacturers cheating by made all cores boost to performance mode when running some benchmark apps.. That makes the difference... You can get more benchmark scores using overclocked kernels and governors...

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
  • Post your comment
Pages: 1 23…910 »
Sort by:

Phone finder

  • Samsung
  • Apple
  • Nokia
  • Sony
  • LG
  • HTC
  • Motorola
  • Huawei
  • Microsoft
  • Lenovo
  • Xiaomi
  • Google
  • Acer
  • Asus
  • Oppo
  • OnePlus
  • Meizu
  • BlackBerry
  • Alcatel
  • ZTE
  • Toshiba
  • Vodafone
  • Energizer
  • XOLO
  • Lava
  • Micromax
  • BLU
  • Gionee
  • vivo
  • LeEco
  • Panasonic
  • HP
  • YU
  • verykool
  • Maxwest
  • Plum

All brands Rumor mill

Popular reviews

Sony Xperia XZ2 review

Sony Xperia XZ2 review
Samsung Galaxy S9 review

Samsung Galaxy S9 review
Apple iPhone X long-term review

Apple iPhone X long-term review

Home News Reviews Compare Coverage Glossary FAQ RSS feed Facebook Twitter

© 2000-2018 GSMArena.com Mobile version Contact us Advertising Privacy Terms of use

CDN by