this is a very nice review!! congrats!
i have meizu m5 and far as I know by now , phone is really good..with some issues..
battery heat quickly, especially when it charge( plastic cover could be a reason),but cooling
down fast as well...secondly MTK chip starts fooling around if its not properly patched(this is a factory disadvantage) and can cause you a lot problems( like in my case when didn"t recognize sim cards and imei numbers)..that"s about it...still don"t know if this phone have directory button?!
I like this shorter review format. just enough to help me understand the phone better. Thanks!
Please dont do these type of short review coz these are not good. Maintain that Gsmarena's review tactics, proper not long but totally gopd review.
Please stop with these small ones instead its better just gives rating in every department and forget it😔😏
We are not abandoning our traditional reviews. We are using this format for phones we can't otherwise fit in our review schedule either because of a heavy workflow or lack of popularity.
So, if we were to use the old format - the M5 and M5 Note reviews would have never happened.
meizu should stop making low-end device
there are to many low-end device in market right now
people now looking for mid-high-end device for for sure
Please, bring back the old way of reviewing mobile phones.
This is too short, and it is lacking of many informations.
This is the better way...
So Nothing can challenge the Redmi 3 series ? I mean Redmi 3s prime.
Battery, Camera, and Display is superb for a budget class.
Seems 2017 is not good year for an upgrade eh.
Regardless of the length of the review, I thought it was very even-handed, balanced. So many reviews are overly negative or positive - phones are portrayed either as stars or as crap. This was a very good review in my opinion. Good reviewer.
This was nice read. I beleive that you should do more of these & go for the Out & Out review only for the Flagships.
Basically, keep the review length as per the pricing. A shorter review for Budget devices as they have limited feature set. A Tad longer for Midrange ones, also including some software tweaks etc. & Out & out for the Flagships as they are the ones with all the bells & whistles.
It is nice. For me, most important things are phone specs, Sunlight contrast ratio, Battery test and how loud speaker is. Also web browser benchmarks are important and 360 spin is nice. If I am not interested in buying phone I read only this and then I skip to end. For me it is better to have more reviews which some have this format than have less but only full format. Time saver editions for me personally is waste of time.
This review format is good for the less mainstream devices, like China devices. But for mainstream devices from big companies, the old thorough review style is still best
I massively prefer the older review style. This was just too brief. I have always like that you guys give detailed, in depth reviews of a massive variety of phones. I hope that you are not planning on only doing the in depth reviews for 'mainstream' devices.