500$ for a Marshmallow smartphone with Cortex A53 cores in 2017. That is just ridiculous. If you are gonna milk the market with a smartphone that costs 500$ have at least two A72 or A73 big cores in it.
Anonymous, 22 Mar 2017That endurance rating should be on all flagships!Less power = less energy consumption, and this phone is a lot less powerful than flagships
SaRPeR, 23 Mar 2017A7 2017 is way better than Redmi Note 4. Redmi Note 4 looks and feels really cheap low quality... moreRedmi Note 3 has snapdragon 650 , so simply buy SD 3
Also Xiaomi supports her products for a lot more years than Samsung. My mi3 still get official updates, my GF's S5 (same period of release) doesn't...
Seth Rollins, 23 Mar 2017A cheap Redmi note 4 beats this phoneA7 2017 is way better than Redmi Note 4. Redmi Note 4 looks and feels really cheap low quality compared to A7 2017 not to mention Redmi Note 4 has a MediTek SoC with really bad optimization.
dara, 23 Mar 2017Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 is the way better even with less than half of the price.Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 is NOT better than Galaxy A7 (2017).
Galaxy A7 2017 costs only 320 EUR in Thailand, that's definitely not what
we call an expensive device!!
Galaxy A7 is 320 EUR in Thailand, that's definitely not what we call an overpriced phone!!
My god that's an awesome 115 hours battery life score. Top 5 in GSMArena's battery life table. When my Galaxy S6 edge dies, I'm getting the Galaxy A7 (2017) for sure.
Wohooo! 115 hours! Simply Amazing! Now I am waiting for the review of A9 Pro (2016) and it's 5000 mAh battery.
Specs-wise, this phone doesn't spell "2017." And it doesn't help that it's way overpriced for what it offers.
The battery endurance is greater on Samsung's midrange lineup because they all have FHD displays whereas their flagships all use QHD. There's just no chance for the battery to last as long when you're powering that many more pixels (which also taxes the CPU/GPU, too.)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 is the way better even with less than half of the price.
cheap mid-range smartphones have a lot better battery life compared top models ...
Anonymous, 22 Mar 2017Seriously what's up with Samsung. Their low end or mid range phones are better than their flag... moreVery doubtful that 6GB gives better day to day performance, it's just Chinese spec wars like having 10 cores.
A lot of things are much better on S7 Edge compared to these phones like the screen, the camera, notification LED, CPU power, faster LTE supporting more bands etc. The phones you mention cost like 80% of the price of the S7 Edge now too.
A5. 2017 has 5-2inch super amoled display 1080p Battery 3000mah gsmarena battery life endurance
3G TT 21:H 39M
web browseing 14H 31M
video playback 16 H 12M
This A7 2017 has bigger 3600mah battery same power efficiency proccesser but 600mah more battery i thought would be battery beast when it comes to video playback when I can see with battery life monster phones, IAM following gsmarena and phonearena from 2009 today is 2017 , i need battery life like example
3G Talk Time 50H
Web browseing 30H
Video playback 40H