Sony Xperia XA1 review Comments
- Anonymous
- Ibxw
Narad, 13 May 2017Very bad mobile. Sir my xa1 mobile phone 2 days old . first and last big problem > my phone... moreJust bad story telling and English mates!!! Hehe
- Anonymous
- nxX}
Anonymous, 11 May 2017What about performance?
A3 is worse than last years XA in every benchmark, just check A3's ... moreThe xa is not optimised
processer is not good less eff
North waterproof
When you compare the battery life threatening a3 2016 and 2017 would oppress it a lot
Xa might have a faster processer but less efficient
Heats up more than the a3
The xa1 has overcome most of these issues but the a3 2017 is a more premium phone
- Willy
- IVDW
Narad, 13 May 2017Very bad mobile. Sir my xa1 mobile phone 2 days old . first and last big problem > my phone... moreGo to service centre and ask them to replace your phone
- smilealittlebit
- 80ua
I'm using a previous-gen model, the XA. And I have to say, I love it. I love the design, I love the way the phone feels in my hand. Two things that could be improved are battery and quantity of RAM. Now that XA1 is better, I'm sure I'll get it as an upgrade. Just have to wait until the price drops. Bought my XA for 180$, which I think was a bargain (in Poland).
- ren122
- Ibxt
shakeelmohammed, 10 May 2017Oh please what are you talking about the xzs crushed its camera making it one of the best go o... moreSony did an amazing job with browsing speed. It's faster than iPhone
- Narad
- gMCb
Very bad mobile. Sir my xa1 mobile phone 2 days old . first and last big problem > my phone not working, and no switching on. Please replesh my phone
Tell me. OK
- YourNicknameOptional
- PA7x
Anonymous, 12 May 2017sony is the king of bloatwaresI'm sure this guy is actually never use any of Sony phone, did you know Asus (the king of bloatware), Samsung (except S8 pre-order edition) etc.
- Anonymous
- thtK
Anonymous, 12 May 2017+ great camera, there are not many phones that can compete with it, + very narrow, easy to ho... moresony is the king of bloatwares
- Anonymous
- thtK
Vensla, 11 May 2017Design reminds me of Xiaomi Mi3yeah. they copy mi3
- Anonymous
- pm2s
+ great camera, there are not many phones that can compete with it,
+ very narrow, easy to hold if you don't have Klitchko sized hands,
+ dual sim AND micro SD at the same time,
+/- Mediatek SOC -> some say it's much worse than Qualcomm SOC, but I haven't seen any comparison of power consumption, performance between these chips,
- small battery, but I am not a heavy user,
- lots of preinstalled software like facebook app (I prefer facebook lite).
- Anonymous
- XNkG
Anonymous, 11 May 2017What about performance? A3 is worse than last years XA in every benchmark, just check A3's ... moreWe are purely comparing battery performance here. No need to drag out all these data. Just pointing out that there is nothing to be overly excited about XA1's supposedly good battery performance.
- Anonymous
- JT5u
Anonymous, 11 May 2017A3 has same screen resolution as XA1. The 0.3 inch screen difference is negligible. The 2 nm a... more Compare it to X Compact and Z3 Compact...
Z3 compact is the king of battery.
- Anonymous
- nFu6
Looks like I'm getting this as an upgrade from my M4. Everything is an upgrade (or the same) but damn that video quality is just not good at all (camera makes up for it).
- Anonymous
- 7tRs
Anonymous, 11 May 2017A3 has same screen resolution as XA1. The 0.3 inch screen difference is negligible. The 2 nm a... moreWhat about performance?
A3 is worse than last years XA in every benchmark, just check A3's review.
While Xa1 is on par with sd625 and also on par with A5 in cpu performance, but weaker in Gpu performance.
A3 is expensive than Xa1, has 2gb RAM, 16gb internal storage and the most dreadful thing............. Larger bezels( less STB ratio).
But A3 has FP scanner and ip68 certification and better battery, whats your choice?
- Anonymous
- vjwZ
Xain47, 06 May 2017Well considering A3 is just 4.7inch and packs a weaker SOC plus 14nm architect....... It's 93h... moreA3 has same screen resolution as XA1. The 0.3 inch screen difference is negligible. The 2 nm architecture difference is also negligible. 93 hr vs 72 hr is a significant difference of 30% though.
Tip us
878k
133k 87k
267k
RSS
Log in
Login with
Sign upFacebook Google