"Value is the name of the game nowadays and it's really tough to keep up with the likes of Moto, Xiaomi and Meizu selling at heavily discounted prices"
Value isn't all about specifications etc., after sales and software updates also included (Like hundreds Nokia Mobile care in India for example and Android 8 update guarantee), even there's only little mention about NFC that even a midrange devices doesn't have.
Anonymous, 01 Jul 2017Well, chipset and amoled screens are going to be the biggest factors - both of which Samsung h... moreUr guess s right.
Mediatek's SoCs are ALL power-hungry, especially the ones with 28nm fabrication process...
The ONLY MediaTek SoC worth mentioning is Helio X20, as the CPU is pretty powerful (above SD652/653), and the GPU is on par (occationally better) with Adreno 510.
IF only Nokia chose the "legendary" MT6752 which have pretty decent performance for low-end device, it will sell like hotcakes...
Here's a FUN FACTS:
Nokia 3: sold at US$150, the ACTUAL PRODUCTION COSTS are sub US$100 (~$80-$90)
Nokia 5: sold at US$200, the ACTUAL PRODUCTION COSTS are sub US$150 (~$100-$130, based on Xiaomi Redmi)
Nokia 6 3GB: sold at US$240, the ACTUAL PRODUCTION COSTS are around US150 (~$130-$150, as 3GB RAM and FHD display, as well as a piece of metal inside the phone are costly) based on Xiaomi Redmi
Nokia 6 4GB: sold at US$300, the ACTUAL PRODUCTION COSTS are around US$160 (~$150-170, well, the difference of 4GB RAM and 3GB RAM in price is not big, as 4GB RAM are the norm today at China)
So, how expensive Nokia flagship will be priced? The rumor said around US$700, but if they could sell it at $850, why not?
as u can see, Nokia 6 standard profit is around US$90 per device, and the Arte ones are around US$130 per device with difference only in RAM, color, and "premium" gimmick...
If they can make Nokia 8/9, the "flagship" device, around US$400, the same as OnePlus 5, why should they HMD priced it US$700 when their potential buyer are willing to pay MORE (near iphone price tag)?
Fanboys, don't forget about Nokia X, XL, and X2, which are all POS devices that Nokia had abandoned before after sold it at CRAZY price tag...
CM3, 01 Jul 2017You will be surprised at how blind the nokia fanboys can be.most of Nokia fans are geeks and Old smartphone users, Apple fans should take that crown
Anonymous, 01 Jul 2017Well, chipset and amoled screens are going to be the biggest factors - both of which Samsung h... moreBattery standby results are odd... there is likely an issue with battery drain.. Xperia l1 with same higher clock chipset Mt6737T with same screen and battery gets 63h rating... I was expecting 70h rating with this lower clocked chip. And it should easily get that given web browsing and Video battery ratings are good...
I hope Google play services aren't consuming all the battery.. they are the biggest battery hog if accounts aren't sync properly or something is trying to access location..
I Sincerely hope Microsoft didn't ruined Nokia's good
standards very much otherwise I still believe Nokia can
Ouch! That was a pretty damning review. Really looking forward to the N5 and N6 reviews. Want to see if there is a pattern or whether the N3 review is an isolated case.
Plus Nokia - where is the other models 7/8/9?
AnonD-234961, 01 Jul 2017Just to put it in perspective: the Galaxy A3 2017 manages 93h from a 2350 mAh battery. The Nok... moreWell, chipset and amoled screens are going to be the biggest factors - both of which Samsung have an advantage in - but still, there is a standby/battery drain issue. Either that or the Mediatek chip is really power hungry.
Just to put it in perspective: the Galaxy A3 2017 manages 93h from a 2350 mAh battery. The Nokia 3 manages only 53h from a 2600 mAh battery...
that;s sad. what does it take for it to be an Android One device?
Thank you for the review, but I must say the benchmark commentary could be more helpful. You wrote the performance is on the level "your grandma could use". The author should see beyond his way of using tech and notice that there are people who can find this device to perform well enough. Does everyone need more than couple of apps running in the background? Does everyone play games on their phones? After a week of using this phone I must say I'm satisfied with it. In my opinion with rational use many people can be too.
It's very difficult to find a well done review these days. Instead of showing how much device lack to the top reviewers should describe what kind of user could find a particular device useful.
Camera Quality Good...Separate Memory SD Card Slot.. 10 hrs Browsing Time, 8:30hrs Video Is Very Good......Hardware Quality Good..... Display Looks Very Good And 2.8 Ratio In Sunlight Not Bad (Check Other Phones Ratio U Will Understand).....Software UI Custom Rom ( Very Smooth) Like U Feels In Moto Phones...... Performance Good For Normal Users...... Audio Good.... Good Build Quality Premium Feel...... If Ur A Normal User Go For Nokia Otherwise Many Chinese Out There Redmi Note 4, Lenovo K6 Power Etc :)
I am purely depending on Nokia brand, non others are not durable, like quality, battery life, sound etc., I was waiting long for relaunch Nokia. I first brought New 3310 and Nokia 3 continuously, best wishes to Nokia to shine better and long last........
The 3, is one thing. The 5, has a very different and beautiful smooth edge to the body. I like it. Great test phones.
Nokia 6, super tough.
For me I am looking to the flagship.
Nokia 9 is coming with the exclusive Nokia OZO Audio enabled. Significantly different from the normal phone audio. https://ozo.nokia.com/eu/nokia-ozo-audio
Solid. New horizon. Bring it on.
AnonD-287672, 30 Jun 2017Crappy phone. How blind could one be to buy this POS?You will be surprised at how blind the nokia fanboys can be.
Based this phone, the true reason that makes NOKIA down isnt Windows Mobile OS, but they pricing...