i have been used both of these phone..
for me, k850 is better in low light photo because in has a great cyber-shot flash. but in term of people with 'shaking hand', better use N95..
if u dont believe MUKTI, u can use both N95 n K850i to prove it..
to Lee...seems like u r fan of nokia..
be patient coz all camera phone got their advantage n disadvantage..
N95 losing to K850i in certain shot and K850i also...
so,both camera phone got their own nice thing
but wont mind if ur phone hang or lagging?
Nokia user are familiar with lagging phone..go n ask Sony Ericsson about it..
i`m prefer K850i respectively K810i
Maybe it hangs because, u haven't updated the phone firmware. The first version is loaded with good features with also LOTS of "bugs"
how about NOKIA N95 VS Canon EOS D1 Mark3 :p :D ,,,
or SE K850 VS Nikon D80,,,heee :d :p
I have been using n95 since one year . It is a terrible phone. It hangs a lot. I am suffering because I buyed
actually nokia are the most experienced camera producers out of every camera related company ever.
they produce the most cameras per year than anyone else.
oh yeah and the camera on the n95 is far better than the one on the k850 and it came out 2 years earlier! haha.
oh nokia you impress me how far ahead you are.
The design of the Sony Ericsson K850 is nicer than Nokia N95. And SE K850 is lighter than Nokia N95 too. The price of K850 is cheaper than Nokia N95. I prefer SonyErisson K850.
In March I will be buying SE K850i (not yet sure about that) and I've been searching for many reviews about SE K850i and I had read that its camera produces good pictures...but not as good like Nokia N95 (although the previous cellphones Nokia had made are tending to produce images that are over-sharpened)...So I guess that Nokia had improved their cameraphones especially with N82...(it has xenon flash)...but one thing I can say about Nokia is that their phones are not too worthy of having a price like 500 euros...too overpriced...
but to SE, I think they will solve that problem, having noisier images...because they are manufacturers of quality cameras! unlike Nokia...an unexperienced one.
For those who hate Sony Ericsson, you can invent a mobile phone like K850i with 0.00001 Mp
both r best but in camera cyber-shot iz better dan carl zeiss
and in sound u know dat sony has better sound as compared to nokkia n95.. in features nokia iz de best
but i like K850 most...
I assume that I'm a Nokia-hater.. Anyway..
It seems that the pictures you took to the boat, for example, are pictures of "printed pictures".. Why don't you let the phones take the photo outdoor with some difficulties? I mean, a street, with a lot of objects to focus.. Or anything..
Tryed NIGHT (without any light) shoots? Just Flash..
wow! i just cant affort to do without nokia n95.It is so unique to be called a phone..It is indeed "nokia"
as per im using nokia since last 7 yrs but the best handset i liked most n95 i dnt like SE coz finds me very difficult to opprate!really the most leading handset will be N95 now also in future
Yes,LG viewty is the only phone(and digital camera) that cac write video in high quality with a speed of 120fps and in QVGA format.
I am a photographer i can understand what this means.It's perfect for a mobile,almost near PERFECTION!!!
Hey, Ive just got the LG viewty, my choice was between the K850i and the Viewty, went with the Viewty as iv heard bad things about the touch button controls on the sony ericsson, if it werent for that id have certainly went for the sony ericsson as i love them. Plus the viewty has the schneider lens, which kin da brings me onto my point which relates to this article.
Is it fair to consider sony ericsson Cybershot phones true Cybershot phones? They dont comne with the Carl Zeiss lens that is present - and is a huge selling point - in all sony dedicated digital cameras.
Interestingly this very same lens is now actually present in the Nokia N95 and several other nokia phones.
Just a tohugh. :)