AnonD-670091, 26 Aug 2017No, the waste is 1440p on 5.3inch phone. The other one is that display one of the most expensi... moreAgreed.
Also tell that to the Sony that used a 3840x2160 pixels screen on Sony XZ premium.they literally want to ruin their phone :-/
Nokia 8 is good but not great. In short summary - Nokia 8 won't bring back Nokia leading as king.
Beside the processor, everything is still one step behind current flagship release this year. If this Nokia 8 is releasing on 2016 or 2015 then different story.
For now, it just a ok phone but cannot compete with recent flagship.
AnonD-670091, 26 Aug 2017No, the waste is 1440p on 5.3inch phone. The other one is that display one of the most expensi... moreAbsolutely true. What is the need for resolutions beyond 1080? kills battery
AnonD-145316, 26 Aug 2017Really??!! Have you even gone through the review of Nokia 8?! Any person in the right senses w... moreLOL right. Awesome 4 hours of OST, probably.
Why do people keep paying tons of money for crap like that?
Anonymous, 26 Aug 2017I agree with you.. Nokia 6 produced better photos with its 16MP sensor.. Goes to show that not... moreIn order for that to happen, they either revive symbian or use the futuristic snapdragon 900/860/866/870/888/879 to make a 41mp camera. Right now SD 835 only has limited up to 30mp.
I don't get one thing: how can you praise this phone for "excellent" camera when its camera is inferior to the S8 and G6? On low-light photos you can clearly see lack of detail.
I'm starting to realize the cheap build quality of the LG G series whether they used glass or flimsy plastic with metallic skin dating back to the Optimus G. My LG G5 took a minor fall inside its holster case and it got dent instantly on top of the phone. My G3 Beat got a minor crack on top as well. My V20 had no protection and gets dragged onto tile and ZERO flaws. Military-graded materials. G5 is a plastic toy compared to it.
Made me realize the only good manufacturers that offers durability comes from the cell phone pioneers - Motorola or Nokia. Moto is now owned by Lenovo and Nokia is more HMD but they are still who they were before. Ability to offer phones with the clearest reception and durable phones with lower prices.
Stick to Motorola and Nokia. The rest are catered to cheapskates and hipsters trying to look cool for strangers. I don't trust the Essential Phone's camera, so I will stick to the Nokia 8. Once I sell my G5 and S7 edge, my next phone will be either a Nokia or Pixel for sure.
So,good old Nokia is back.As I can see,they've built a proper phone after years,but that price-over 700$ cannot be competitive.New models will come and if HMD drops the price below 500$ maybe they'll take some market share in 'flagship' territory..
Couple months ago I bought Xiaomi Mi6,Oneplus5 was also considered,even ZTE Axon7.Paid 440$,my Mi6 runs like a dream and I cannot justify paying almost 300$ more for Nokia 8.And that amazing looking new Sharp Aquos S3 will probably be good 200$ cheaper then 8,but availability will be a problem.So,tough competition for Nokia,but it's nice to see another (old) player taking some share off Sams,Apple...
Plenty of doubts in this review.
Why is autofocus not tested on another copy of the phone? Why there is no test for different color spaces and color accuracy on the display?
The Nokia OS is bloat free and pretty close to stock but One Plus also has that advantage.
AnonD-34062, 26 Aug 2017Calm down dude. I won't buy the phone, ok. I promise. Just don't have a stroke. Seems like a lot of these people are headed to stroke city :'( .
AnonD-599013, 26 Aug 2017Sadly, the overall impression is kind of meh... it's a good all-rounder phone, bt it doesn't e... moreDid we read the same review?
"HMD got everything right in the camera department. The image quality is great, the specs are as relevant as they can get." Directly from review.
So the camera seems to be really good. Also other camera review have been positive. Less artificial sharpening is the key in most reviews I have seen. And that is the one reason why the picture is better in this than for example Samsung 8.
It is now based on what you want to have. Samsung 8 has higher screen to body ratio. Nokia 8 seems to be more durable. And so on. Good phone. Too expensive for me, but so Are other flagship phones including Onepluss 5. Nefinitely better than Onepluss, but Also a 50Â€ more expensive so tight competition in there. 200 euros cheaper than Samsung 8... so not so tight competition in there. V30 from LG is still unknown for the price, same as pixel2. But if I have to ques They both Are more expensive. So the Nokia 9 is the phone to put against those models.
In this price gategory we have Onepluss 5 that is a Little bit cheaper as well as Honor 9. Huaway P10 is more expensive, but not by much. So good competition in here!
nice job nokia , i will look into ifa but most likely this will be my next phone
[deleted post]A full grown human being like asking what are Nokias innovation??!!! Are you 18yrs old??! No point trying to educate you about Nokias technology.
Quantom, 26 Aug 2017The Nokia 6 camera doesn't deserve "worst" as you've described. For example, consider the smal... moreI agree with you.. Nokia 6 produced better photos with its 16MP sensor.. Goes to show that nothing beats megapixels.. So come on HMD give us another 41MP phone already
It's so great that NOKIA came back on top of the hill with the 8, but I would have liked to see a revival of the Lumia 1020, something even better. I hope that NOKIA 9, 10 or whatever it'll be named will really be the best camera smartphone yet. I don't care if they'll make it thicker, more robust, just add a monster camera and I will do the "shut up and take my money now!" thing! Cheers!
s4f786, 26 Aug 2017I wouldn't put the battery life as one of the best, the s6 had 73 hours eating and that's a 2 ... moreS6 had very bad sot. It got the score due to high stand by time. This one has much better sot. Gsma writes it themselves how the scores are given. Can't you guys see that