What about the speaker? Is it still stereo hybrid (front facing and bottom facing) or single bottom facing?
Your head in the 360 camera hahaha.
There were rumours the amoled is supplied by boe. Maybe you can check. Also unlikely Samsung will sell 2k amoled to anyone, even apple did not get them.
Qhd ips lcd = inferior, less battery efficient display
Fhd amoled = inferior, battery efficient display
Dunno which is better to be honest. Lol huawei
Shots looks perfect, almost no noise but colors do not pop out so much, wonder why.
Anonymous, 16 Oct 2017Uhm doesn't S8 have both ip68 and 3.5? Also if they could make a phone with type c port ip67, ... moreSamsung has actually managed a lot of neat tricks with their latest models (apart from repairability due to how crammed everything is). This includes the IP68 rating, thinness and battery size in spite of including a 3.5 mm jack.
It should be noted though that water and dust ingress is not covered by the typical warranty, and Samsung has had devices fail for that very thing. Having another port is to have another point of potential failure over time. The 3.5 mm port is nice to have, but not without its own drawbacks.
FinnishInquisition, 16 Oct 2017The reason the Mate 10 only has IP53 unlike the IP67 Pro is probably because of that 3.5 mm AU... moreUhm doesn't S8 have both ip68 and 3.5? Also if they could make a phone with type c port ip67, IMO it shouldn't be hard for an extra port. But that's just me
Good devices, but again - "no"
bot-pro version looks good in everything, but no IP67(8).
Pro-version has IP67 (why not 68?), but low screen resolution (1080+ can be ok for IPS, not for amoled with pentile matrix) and no 3.5 jack.
This is really strange, when basic version has better screen than Pro.
Display quality is unknown: previous Huawei devices lack good factory calibration.
The reason the Mate 10 only has IP53 unlike the IP67 Pro is probably because of that 3.5 mm AUX port, which is always a tricky thing to prevent dust and water ingress to.
But I cannot for the life of me understand why they only went with Bluetooth 4.2 instead of 5. The whole specification sheet screams of "Do we future-proof our phone or not?".
AnonD-304305, 16 Oct 2017If only huawei made the secondary camera as wide angle, i would be very happy. I know that the... moreSeems like the perfect phone...other than the foliage looking like oilpaint.
It's a shame another company went without 3,5 jack in its premium offering. Really dissapointed, although it was kinda expected...