Nokia super fan, 06 Jan 2018I would rather pick a phone which is rugged, fast and smooth and get faster update. Bingo, it'... moreThis is nokia 2 review, and i refer to that device,
Go ahead with nokia 8, no one asking.. I bet you dont want to use nokia 2 either..
Grigore Ionescu, 09 Jan 2018I think that a phone with a flimsy plastic battery cover which isn't actually a battery cover ... moreReally only aluminium makes a phone well made. Would you read again gsmarena authors who Â„repeatedly said having plastic on phones is not badÂ“. How dows it feel having now all phones with glass back? I for once will always choose if available the plastic ones though they will less and less. By plastic there was wonderful time you drop phone on beton and it sparated itself in pieces like cover battery and main. You assembled them back and were good to go. Now enjoy your spider webs if you dropped new phone.
Besides this here is just terrobly made phone at dumping price. Its back cover beimg flimsy is your last concern. Peace
Grigore Ionescu, 09 Jan 2018I think that a phone with a flimsy plastic battery cover which isn't actually a battery cover ... morewat is wrong with u pple nagging here and dere cant u see is a budget phone for pple low on income and i mean very low on income
Anonymous, 07 Jan 2018friend, you are paying for the excellent build quality don't forgetI think that a phone with a flimsy plastic battery cover which isn't actually a battery cover (why is that?) is not in the category of a quality made phone. These days aluminum or metal frame could be found on a lot of phones in these price range.
Also, the excelent build quality is not yet proven with HMD Global Nokia. We will see that in the near future.
It has gorilla glass bro, non of the competition has, next phone from other producers is LG K8 and after this only above 300 euro, so you might think about it again!
molise, 07 Jan 2018It's been complicated to buy this device in 2018 not complicated as choosing samsung phone
2017 was first year in mobile realm for HMD and they made quite few mistakes. releasing phones which were underpowered for it's price (even if we account their promise of better software support than others which adds premium to a phone).
Nokia 2 was one of them.
It was clear , that this device will slow. It was clear, that after Nokia 3, a phone with weaker spec sheet will annoyingly slower. But they still did.
And when with Nokia 3, they could have excuse themselves by pointing to competitors, who use same or similar SoC-s, I can't remember a phone released 2017, which had Snapdragon 212.
Unbiased Sony Fanboy, 07 Jan 2018Increase the price by about $70 and put at least 2GB RAM, SD450, and 32GB storage.friend, just buy a nokia 6
Pritam923, 07 Jan 2018Nokia your era is end. But I still never forget your Larger Sensor camera phone Nokia N8nokia 808 has bigger sensor. the true nokia legendary camera with phone functionality
Nokia naming convention is too confusing. Their names are not consistent.
Really GSM thusb star rating but for low end C mfgs you guys praise! SMH
Nokia your era is end. But I still never forget your Larger Sensor camera phone Nokia N8
Increase the price by about $70 and put at least 2GB RAM, SD450, and 32GB storage.
GSM, the Nokia 'magic' ended almost two decades ago I'm afraid to say.
Phillips was my first mobile then Nokia for years as they delivered the best tech at the time.
Sadly Nokia relied on their rep and young upstarts (in the market) like LG and Samsung forged ahead through their extensive R&D. Samsung's AMOLED and superior tech won it for me.
I'd say that even N73 made better photos, having 3,15 mpx camera.
One between two ;
Nokia 2 - Very good built quality, fluid stock android experience for second daily driver/entry level phone.
Redmi 5a - Decent built quality, worth for price to performance ratio, good soc and ram configuration, should be best phone in this categories.