Ascorth, 06 Jan 2018No its not better... I rather have fragile but snappy smartphone than ruged but with slowest ... moreI would rather pick a phone which is rugged, fast and smooth and get faster update. Bingo, it's Nokia 8!!!!!!
Anonymous, 06 Jan 2018C'mon 8gb storage is not a problem, Micro SD is dirt cheap now. The camera is okay for anyone ... moreC'mon, did you ever tried to install something to 8 gb storage? 212 sd 5 years old processor? For that price? Are you sure what are you defending? It's a crap. Worst 2017/2018 phone."nokia". Huh.
Anonymous, 06 Jan 2018C'mon 8gb storage is not a problem, Micro SD is dirt cheap now. The camera is okay for anyone ... moreNo its not better... I rather have fragile but snappy smartphone than ruged but with slowest performance.. if the price simillar..
I just put better hard case, and problem solved..
Anonymous, 06 Jan 2018C'mon 8gb storage is not a problem, Micro SD is dirt cheap now. The camera is okay for anyone ... more'strong build quality' alone is not enough as we are not going to war with this phone. Nokia should have provided at least a SD 410 processor . No body unless Nokia fanboys are going to buy this while redmi 4/4a/5a sells like hot cakes. Redmi 5A is only Rs 4999
C'mon 8gb storage is not a problem, Micro SD is dirt cheap now. The camera is okay for anyone that doesn't care about having the best phone camera and just wants to be 'able' to take photos. The 212 processor must've been chosen to keep the price low. I know, that Xiaomi and Meizu have a better CPU, but Nokia 2 has the strong build quality, much more beautiful design by comparison, and the brand name. That alone makes it more better.
hahaha 30min for %10 battery charge, cmon now......2018 dat nasty!!!!!! 8GB!!!!! PASS all phones should minimal be 2gig ram/ 16GB
The only thing wrong with this phone is the price. Nokia should have not priced this as much as Â€99, instead, they can make it as low as Â€77. It will change the game.
u guyz should say wat u want,its still a great phone with its low specs,dosnt heat up,dosnt hang either,great bettry life,durable,compact size,regular update etc if u dont like it nobody is puting a gun to ur heads,GO NOKIAA
Why did nokia even bothered with it even battery life is disappointing (xperia xz1 compact has around same battery life with only 2700mah battery
I hope oreo go does oncrease performance atleast where its not sluggish and wonder what nokia 1 is going to be like
Wonderful battery life of 109 hours. Please also review the Moto E4 Plus and it's 5000 mAh battery too!
I love these occasional low-end phones though. Their specs have a charm of their own and their simplicity means I would still choose them over say a 3.5 mm jack-less iPhone X....
I still have a perfectly working low-end Samsung Android Froyo (that is pretty snappy too due to almost no downloaded apps).
These guys are disappointed with 720p? Huh, my phone has a glorious maximum of 320p@15fps!
Take that iPhone X! (Well, technically the iPhone doesn't have a 320p @ 15fps option either)! :P
Moral of this story is spend that little bit extra and get something else.
Nokia already had a moderately acceptable and competitive 'budget' option in the 3, so this device is as redundant as it is obsolete.
In Russia this crap costs 7990 rub or 140 usd. Once again. One hundred forty dollars. For 8990 rub or 157 usd you can grab Xiaomi Redmi Note 5A with 5.5" display, 16 gb rom, 2 gb ram and sd 425. Chinese hmd global, pretending to be Finnish "nokia" living in distant world and trying to sell 5 years old soecs chinaphone for ridiculous price. You can buy the same phone from other chinese oems at one third of "nokia" 2 price.