Samsung Galaxy S9 review Comments
- Hayaan Mo Sila
- sxr
xXENDER FREAKXx, 10 Mar 2018Damn, that is impressive for Sony if u compare it with the XPERIA XZ1. I could say it still go... moreI guess it's the new Qualcomm ISP that is co-developed with Sony that improved the image quality so vastly.
But damn, 1/8s is pretty long. I guess it's the OIS that is missing, and causes it.
- xXENDER FREAKXx
- uJ5
XtremE16, 10 Mar 2018Omg !!! Sony really improved motion eye camera for low light Sony is back Guys check... moreDamn, that is impressive for Sony if u compare it with the XPERIA XZ1. I could say it still got a chance to compete with the top players. They reduced the amount of noise present compared to the XPERIA XZ1 by reducing the ISO and go for a slower shutter speed, this time they are a little aggressive on the detail and sharpness. If OIS in on-board, maybe it will yield better results
- Panino Manino
- LpC
kakouille, 10 Mar 2018You need help.
"When the light goes down, the S9 imaging skills become even more exceptional.... moreHe was talking about the studio pictures.
I was responding about what he talked about the studio pictures.
- Anonymous
- 0p}
AnonD-553488, 10 Mar 2018Hi friends. I need some advice for my next phone. I have a iphone se and looking to upgrade. H... moreiOS if you have a lot apple product and for longer continuous "cough" update "cough", android for freedom and fine about thinking much. IMO 5 years for a phone is asking too much (or get boring at least), get mid tier and replace each 2 years.
- AnonD-553488
- fCR
Hi friends. I need some advice for my next phone. I have a iphone se and looking to upgrade. Here in India iPhone 8 64gb and Galaxy S9 both are available at same price of around Rs52000. I know specs wise and features wise iphone 8 looses big time against S9, but i also know perfomance wise and security wise iphone 8 should last 4 to 5 years as against around 3 years for the S9. What should I buy. I am comfortable with any OS, so thats not an issue. I am looking more from value for money and longevity as i am not going to spend 50k every few years so my phone should last me around 4 to 5 years if i spend so much.
- Anonymous
- niV
DarkJava, 10 Mar 2018And apple has been "falling" for nearly 2 decades now :/Apple os genuinely doing new things despite the detractors. Samsung used to sas well... she doesn't anymore. She's another copycat company with old hardware.
F*** 'em
- XtremE16
- 7k6
Omg !!! Sony really improved motion eye camera for low light
Sony is back
Guys check out
Go to tool and find camera compare
- Anonymous
- niV
AnonD-538833, 10 Mar 2018The most mediocre flagship device released by samsung ever. The lack of enthusiasm in all the ... moreThe same they said when they found out that S8 had worse battery endurance than s7E. They won't care.
In the primary 3 (endurance, performance, ergonomy) S7E is Samsung's peak (in S series at least). Best battery, most apps in ram, easy to use fingerprint, 16:9 screen. That says a lot. 2 year old phone wins over any other...
- Anonymous
- Js{
kakouille, 10 Mar 2018You need help.
"When the light goes down, the S9 imaging skills become even more exceptional.... moreNo phone on auto goes 1/4s...
1/8 or faster...
- Anonymous
- Js{
Still crappy selfies...
How can it overexpose background if it has HDR?
My 2015 phone does better..
- AnonD-468012
- X{3
kakouille, 10 Mar 2018You need help. "When the light goes down, the S9 imaging skills become even more exceptional.... moreWait, 1/4 shutter speed? I think other flagships smartphone not really need 1/4 shutter speed to great low light photography.
- Anonymous
- Js{
AnonD-501073, 10 Mar 2018Do you guys took the low light shots at f/2.4? cuz there's no way they should be worse than s8.All shots of photo tool are on auto. If they are f2.4 or f1.5 , choice made by the phone...
- Anonymous
- IsY
Funny how some people argue for a phone. It's not a special phone and it ain't that nice or that distinctive from the rest. It's just a phone, another phone.
- AnonD-501073
- YMk
Do you guys took the low light shots at f/2.4? cuz there's no way they should be worse than s8.
- Anonymous
- Js{
kakouille, 10 Mar 2018You need help.
"When the light goes down, the S9 imaging skills become even more exceptional.... moreHi @Kakouille
What he is saying is true... The low light samples of S9 available to compare have ISO 250 e SS 1/14s.
The samples of XZ2 show ISO 200 and SS 1/8s.
I have now idea how it is possible, because Sony trades off OIS for high ISO to prevent blur. All Xperia were supposed to shoot at 600+ in this situation.
Samples of XZ1 have ISO 700 or 800..
- Anonymous
- gBV
"F/1.5 will allow for low ISO shooting, which will translate into less noise"
In most cases noise doesn't depend much on the Iso. In fact a higher Iso decreases(!) the captured noise, if shutter speed and aperture are the same. Yes, at Iso 6400 f/1.8 1/10s a sensor captures less noise than at Iso 100 f/1.8 1/10s. The higher Iso only makes more noise visible(!) due to the brighter image, but it doesn't increase the actual captured noise. A higher Iso even leads to slightly less captured noise.
- kakouille
- Ega
Panino Manino, 10 Mar 2018"1) the XZ2 has much better quality than the S9 in the low light scene."
This XZ2 impressed m... moreYou need help.
"When the light goes down, the S9 imaging skills become even more exceptional. The OIS, the bright F/1.5 lens, the large 1.4um pixels, and the Multi-Frame Image Processing all combine to produce unmatched low-light shots.
Where most of the current flagships with F/1.7-F/1.8 and OIS shoot at ISO 400 and, say, 1/4s shutter speed, the Galaxy S9 chooses and ISO between 250 and 320, and a shutter speed of 1/10s. The result - great low-light images with lots of detail, little noise, and no blurry spots."
Tip us
1.9m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up