Well , 85 hours ER (ofc with UD-display on) with 4200 mAh ? That's quite below average for that gargantuar capacity battery of Mate 20 Pro if i had tell the truth . I wonder , how on earth it get lost compared to XZ3 with 3330 mAh (90hr ER) , despite both using QHD+ (though different aspect ratio) similar screen area based on 16:9 projection , and similar pixel per inch density .... Sure , the web browsing time , 3G talk time and video playback is considerable , but how it only get 85hr ? Still , Mate 20 Pro is a great phone from Huawei .
Josh, 28 Oct 2018Because they are always obsessed with Artificial numbers! Every youtube reviewer who has exten... moreDo not trust youtubers...
Of course they will praise. They want to get units as soon as possible to publish their videos.
There are YouTubers that get many stuff for free. Not only the phones but speakers, headphones, laptops...
Most people use Samsung, Apple, Huawei and Xioami.. If they point the bad things about these products they will lose viewers.
We all know iPhones have poor battery life. Some videos out there are edited to make people think they can go full day easily.
First of all let's be real here, no reviewers are saying Note 9's battery life is as good as P20 Pro nor Mate 10 Pro, either of which have lower battery rating than Note 9 on this website. There are also many tests showing iPhone XS Max lasts longer than most other flagship phones out there despite what GSMArena says.
So all the haters who are sh*tting on this phone just because it got relatively low mark in their battery benchmark can shut up until real life battery tests will come out. And don't forget the fact that Note 9 ships with FHD+ resolution settings instead of QHD+ to greatly extend the battery life, whereas on smartphones from other manufacturers it's set to full resolution.
However, to be completely honest, I'm quite disappointed with Mate 20 Pro. I was one of those who were hyped up with this phone but then got let down in so many ways. But why? Well, here are a few of them:
-No headphone jack
-A speaker which gets muffled when connecting USB cable, which is purely idiotic
-Only marginal overall camera performance improvement from P20 Pro, sometimes even worse depending on the scene
-Color inaccurate display
-No monochrome sensor(the feature I honestly love the most on my Mate 10 Pro - now they took it away and replaced with a rather mundane wide angle lens)
-They were bothered to put NM card slot but not MicroSD card slot, wtf
And the list goes on. I've been using Huawei phones for a while but that's because they've been making competitive products that I have reasons to buy over flagships from other manufacturers, but sadly it no longer seems to be the case here. To me there's no point of getting this phone over Galaxy Note 9 apart from faster performance and better, but not astonishingly better battery life. Note 9 just covers basics more throughly and I really like how Samsung doesn't skimp on tiny details.
Heck, I could even go for iPhone XS if I wanted consistently great camera performance, and that one would also give me class leading SoC performance and battery life with promised 5 years of software support. So again, why would I want to buy Mate 20 Pro over these two? I mean it's not like Mate 20 Pro is priced cheaper than Note 9 or iPhone XS, why pay the same amount of money to get less? I'll just skip this one and wait for P30 Pro to come out next year, and if it doesn't bring any sort of revolutionary improvement to the camera department, I'll just ditch Huawei and go for Galaxy S10.
85 hours average? That's a pretty good score. I'm sure software updates will make GSMArena retake it.
So, sometimes the shots are not on pair with p20 Pro, I bet that's why they don't want to have Dxo score out.
Maybe it got lower than 109.
Kiyasuriin, 28 Oct 2018I actually do. but I always seek a better device. I have the SM-N960U1. 845/8/512 version. my... moreMine's SM-960F Exynos 9810, 8/512 One.. The Perfect Smartphone Right Now.. But Still Dying Get It's SDM 845 Version..
Imperator Neubaticus, 28 Oct 2018Lol this phone is a joke. Huawei boasts of a "large" battery and yet this gimmick has a shorte... moreHahahaa yes yes crap 4200mah battery and low quality.
I was expecting its better around 95hrs to 100hrs... See what happend effect of their arrogance. Lol
I feel disappointed about their kirin 980.
Not only it does not achieve comparable results to Apple like Huawei claimed but it's even looses to Snapdragon 845 in graphics.
Next year snapdragon will surpass it big time.
Anonymous, 28 Oct 2018My Mate 10 Pro gets 15h20m while web browsing, just saying... Mate 20 Pro also has a larger higher resolution screen, 3D face scanning and an in-screen fingerprint reader. Just saying..
Where's the camera comparison studio shots?
Would love to see if/how Huawei's image processing has improved!
Kirin CPUs are in between Snapdragon and Exynos processor. Not perfect and also cannot unlock the bootloader so a bad choice for custom rom enthusiasts..
Huawei Mate 20 Pro is an awesome smartphone, no doubts. Generally the only problem with it is the price. In the end of the day it's a hugely overpriced Chinese phone. And I'm pretty sure that "old" iPhone X is a way more advanced piece of technology and overall better quality phone for less money right now.
ryballs, 28 Oct 2018Why is everyone saying the M20 Pro has poor battery life when it gets 14 hours while web brows... moreBecause they are always obsessed with Artificial numbers! Every youtube reviewer who has extensively used the Mate 20 pro was amazed by the Mate 20pro battery. Despite that lovely screen and all that tech that mate 20 pro has, still manages to blow most of the flagships! I admit i haven't used Mate 20 pro yet but i can base my facts from many YouTubers who have actually used the Mate 20 pro, and all of them have praised its battery capability.
Why is everyone saying the M20 Pro has poor battery life when it gets 14 hours while web browsing? As web browsing/apps are what people mainly use their phones for nowadays, that's the number I'm mostly interested in. Compare the M20 Pro's 14 hours to other flagships with similar display size: Note9 only gets 12.5 hours and iPhone XS gets even less at 11 hours. Of course M20 Pro gets less battery life than the M10 Pro, it has a bigger screen with higher resolution and many additional features that all eat up the battery life. Considering all that I think the 14 hours web browsing battery life is great. Also to those people complaining about OIS, if the photos are still class leading without it and the video has great EIS, who cares?