CptPower, 21 Feb 2019Yes man but even a 150 euros cannon or Nikon can do a lot better photos than best camera phone... moreBut the one you are referring to cannot make calls, cannot send SMS, cannot access the internet, cannot play games, cannot use FB/instagram. If it can, then im going to throw away my m20p and change over to that camera you are pointing out.
Anonymous, 20 Feb 2019The main topic here is the camera and admit it. The phones listed on this post is much better ... moreYes man but even a 150 euros cannon or Nikon can do a lot better photos than best camera phone ever created.
Nikon D3400 for example now can be bought for 250 if you know how and where and it outpreforms any phone that will be created within next 5-10 years.
CptPower, 20 Feb 2019MNan no phone cost just 100 more with IP protection Super amoled and Stereo from a Poco price ... moreThe main topic here is the camera and admit it. The phones listed on this post is much better than the camera quality of the POCO. Yes it is given that the poco is cheaper because it is for the masses that is what xiaomi is for but for those who can afford to better get the best phone around then why get the cheaper (Although having similar specs) phone? And back to the topic, I do have the Mate 20 pro and this is the best so far for me (Previously I got the ROG phone) and I am not a smartphone camera enthusiast since I am a gamer so I do care less about the camera but I often use them and if I am going to differentiate pocophone and my mate 20 pro then poco is far from the quality of the mate 20 pro's camera.
Vvvky, 17 Feb 2019Yes man it's fine to pay 100 or 200 dollars more than the Poco for those additional features l... moreMNan no phone cost just 100 more with IP protection Super amoled and Stereo from a Poco price which now can be bought for 260. Thats stupid.
The cheapest phones cost around 600 which is 340 bucks more.
And older flagships are worse than Poco in performance.
For example S6 or S7.
Vvvky, 17 Feb 2019900 dollar Samsung, Pixel or Huawei 3 times better than 300 dollar Poco ?Man i dont think so. On a benchmark test Poco is completely equal or even faster.
And I dont think that better screen, stereo and IP protection are worth 600 more bucks.
CptPower, 17 Feb 2019Man on a benchmark test Poco is equal to any other flagship you can name.
And i dont think t... moreYes man it's fine to pay 100 or 200 dollars more than the Poco for those additional features like IP 68 rating, telephoto/ultrawide camera, AMOLED, etc. People are just waiting their money and they are fine with it. I think it's best to but previous generation flagships or wait till the current one gets down to a reasonable price.
I am abosolutely in in love with the V40 right now it's launched in my country for 700 USD and the V30 has dropped down to just 390 USD so I'm patiently waiting till the V40 drops down below the 500 USD mark.
Vvvky, 17 Feb 2019900 dollar Samsung, Pixel or Huawei 3 times better than 300 dollar Poco ?Man on a benchmark test Poco is equal to any other flagship you can name.
And i dont think that more features like better screen stereo or IP67 which Samsung or Sony phone have are worth 700 more bucks.
Correct me if i am wrong.
Vvvky, 17 Feb 2019Great comment dude. People who will but 1000 dollars worth smartphones only for the camera sho... moreWell yes but this Status symbol is No more.
Top brands are equal. There is no premium brand Apart Vertu.
Apple Samsung Sony Xiaomi Huawei i can continue their flagships are at equal level only price makes difference.
CptPower, 04 Jan 2019Man that correct but if i buy for example Poco for 300 which is as fast as any other flagship ... moreGreat comment dude. People who will but 1000 dollars worth smartphones only for the camera should consider this but anyways status symbol is greater than practical logic.
Disappointed by gsma, 07 Jan 2019Such a high caliber team of gsmarena cannot get us the winner of the camera test Then why to ... moreThis is a geek site. Not a housewife-oriented marketing The Verge.
So the gimmicky mate 20 pro is another unremarkable handset relegated to the "forgettable" category. Noted.
i`m a oneplus fan, but it has the worst cam between.
mate20 pro, v40, note9 n s9 has the best details. but samsung phones note very well at booke effecting.
in the end d750 is the best
Disappointed by gsma, 07 Jan 2019Such a high caliber team of gsmarena cannot get us the winner of the camera test
Then why to ... moreWhat will be your comment if they'll "pick" a winner which is not your "preferred" phone? -,-
They are reviewers and not endorsers. -,-
Good effort Gsmarena team I am not portrait mod Fan. But it's a pleasure to see Angie.. ❤️
Harry Sack, 31 Dec 2018Angie, please stop wearing hats, your look way more pretty without one.....Hahaha...I personally agree on this one
The gsmarena editors are quite objective. The winner is Pixel 3 just look at those photos. We see that photos from Pixel 3 are quite similar to Nikon D750 a full frame SLR and one of the best Nikon camera. So where is Sony. From all of Sony phones XZs and so forth, Pixel 3 is always better photos. So, the crown now hailed to Pixel 3 for camera phone photography.
Such a high caliber team of gsmarena cannot get us the winner of the camera test
Then why to do the test at the fist place.
Being a big name, you guys should let us know which is the best one.......
Do not manipulate with the words & not letting us know which one is the best or you guys dont know which camera is best...
Shame on you GSMARENA....
This is the hightime that you guys prove yourself coz there are other tech blogger who atleast gives us there opinion & dont beat around the bush.....
& GSMARENA might delete this comment i believe.........
The test lacks Xiaomi. I think Xiaomi is among the best for portrait mode