Whackcar, 11 Jan 2019The Pocophone is undoubtedly a great budget phone. I just don't like it when people refer to i... moreBut its is flagship it uses flagship CPU and GPU.
Anything else its just add-on which cost a lot more money but its not for everybody.
Professional, 13 Jan 2019Or you never used a pocophone F1!That's for sure! The MI 8 wich is even better only costs $50 more!I do not need to, i do not waste money in general.
Pocofans hate other paying more for "perfect" phone, while pocohater triggered when others can get 80% flagship experience for 30% price
Is it possible for GSMa to do the battery endurance test on used/long term phones? If yes, then why isn't it done?
Anonymous, 14 Jan 2019200 eur for s9! Are you kidding?Not kidding. It was a Boxing week sale just a couple weeks ago after Christmas. Very happy with it!
Carol, 13 Jan 2019If you call pocoophone good, you most probably never used a good phone.Carol, firstly I have used many phones and currently I am not even using the Pocofone as i had to give it to my Mom, as her phone had broke. For now I am using Galaxy s9, I have also used Mate 20 Pro, which is a great phone and its camera is the best-est of all phones that I have seen till now, the galaxy s9 camera is also very good however pocophone is not behind. It day to day operations while opening and closing app, pocofone is quite faster which is mainly due to software optimizations.
It mostly all YouTube videos which review phones all have said that pocophone is good, so you mean to say that all those people have not used any good phone when they review new phones every week which itself is hilarious and so your comment is not valid. In comparison with the Iphone X also the pocofone's camera and operational time is better.
So just because of the plastic body and some minor compromises is this phone not good..
The bottom line is that this phones achieves 90%-95% of what the most flagships achieve, and even those flagships are not perfect. So just appreciate the good that it does and leave it there.
Don't let the sd845 fool you this is a midranger phone all other components are in mid range level that's the truth
oh cmon, ,,the dynamic range is stellar"!!! really?wtf guys,if it were stellar,it would not cost 300usd.i had this phone for a couple of weeks,it is ok at photos in daylight,but i would not call the dynamic range stellar.also that earpiece was full of crackles and hisses,really low cost.i mean i get it that the whole phone costs 300usd,but if you don't put in it an adequate earpiece, cause after all it a PHONE, what else you can expect?!
drake, 14 Jan 2019Dear poco hater.If poco was so bad phone then why it's still in Top 10 trending phones of week... moreI think noone is a hater of POCO F1. They must not like the brand, Xiaomi. Just in case, Samsung, the biggest Android manufacturer, make POCO F1, so POCO by Samsung with the same price, same spec...it gonna be great. I almost fall in love with POCO until I really need NFC inside. And I am still Xiaomi Redmi or Redmi by Xiaomi till now although I decide to use Galaxy A8 2018 as my daily drive now.
you guys have complaints about xs max 512 GB worth $1,449.you guys complaint about S9+ worth $840,you guys complaint about OP6T $549 .you brag about poco worth $300 what is it that you exactly want ,why don't you suggest phone companies to make customized phone as per customer want.it will be easy for everyone.you can customize as you want. then you will brag about price.
no one will ever make perfect phone as you want. even if the make it,.
someone will definitely hate it.
Anonymous, 14 Jan 2019200 eur for s9! Are you kidding?Be carefull of The Fake S9/S9+, it has 95% same as the original one. I bought S9+ only US$ 85, all is fine but the rear camera, the 8GB ROM and the bixby
To be very honest, i dont think you people concluded well. Its hard to make mind to purchase this device on basis of your theory (a lot of). Crisp points on Pro n Cons will be more helpful.
Anonymous, 12 Jan 2019I paid less than 200 EUR for my S9. Boxing week sale. Not in Europe, of course. :-P200 eur for s9! Are you kidding?
drake, 14 Jan 2019Dear poco hater.If poco was so bad phone then why it's still in Top 10 trending phones of week... moreHaters are going to hate. True. Not everyone can be satisfied so easily like you do. Missing tiny feature like NFC payments can be a big problem for others. Not everyone can take the corners cutting from Xiaomi like you do. Until you stop hating iPhone, others will still be there to hate Poco for what it can offers even for a $300 phone.
Dear poco hater.If poco was so bad phone then why it's still in Top 10 trending phones of week 2.phone was launched in augest and its still in trending list from last 4 and half months.
iphone is Not even in that list.it might have poor built and display.so what you expect glass body or gold body in $300. Haters will be always haters. if you have not used it you would never understand.we accept that display is little bit poor and it does have plastic body. but remeber it was first of its kind.there are many more to come.and just in their first launched the have sold millions of units.stop hating everyting idiots
Heisen8erg, 12 Jan 2019I have a problem understanding the meaning of flagship and midrange. What do you mean when you... moreSo you're saying the Pocophone should be Xiaomi's flagship. We get it.
Thing is, the Mi Mix 3 and Mi 8 Explorer Edition exist, and bar the unfortunate removal of the headphone jack, they're superior to the Pocophone in practically every single way:
- SIGNIFICANTLY more LTE bands supported
- AMOLED display
- Better build and materials
- Better cameras
A flagship device is meant to be a company's best product (e.g. New Ford GT, Acura NSX) built using the best technology they have. It's as simple as that. The Pocophone uses too many "lesser" parts compared to Mi Mix 3...
That clearly shows, how expensive this midranger is . . .
and you'll get much less for your money.
- low midrange display (doesn't even mach the given specs!),
- entry level build,
- terrible mobile connectivity
(even a better - $100 - entry level phone has better 3G and 4G support),
and so on.
Even some budget phones (about $200) and nearly all midrangers have better build.
Poco has only that SD845 and not much more to offer,
just a lots of compromise.
It's a very expensive midranger!
(For that price you can easily get a real flagship from last year,
without compromise - or even an up to date flagship with some luck)
If you are not a hardcore gamer choose a good midranger
and you will get a much better package for less.
Anonymous, 13 Jan 2019Plastic cheap adware unreliable junk is what you pay for and what you get. in 1 years time you... moreYou don’t know what you’re talking about. I went from a Galaxy s7 edge to Poco f1 and I couldn’t be happier. Samsung cracked and broke 5 times (using a case for an edge screen is idiotic because it anihilates the aesthethics and functionality). Spent 300$ on display and back repairs and swore to never again use a glass phone! There is no adware, all bloatware can be uninstalled (unlike samsung&google bs), the phone is fast, irunlock works in Europe (if you put France as your country in Settings), it lets you put in location unlike Samsung. The screen is only a little worse than the Samsung super amoled - nothing too different. I have had Samsung flagdhips since the 1st galaxy (all of them) and I will never buy them again.