The conclusions are wrong. Shoot P30P, output RAW and see how much worse it is than the Nokia's. The Nokia's is a stacked RAW, iPX's is a regular single exposure RAW, while P30P's is a "debinned" RAW that doesn't even combine adjacent pixels in that RYYB layout for additional DR and better color accuracy(though still poor), resulting in 40MP of very poor signal you'd expect from 0.8μm pixels, you'll get nowhere from P30P's RAW output, and I can't believe you never bothered to try.
Jess, 07 Aug 2019Is this real? Or is this only a concept??Haha you can see the phone right?
They're on the right track, just sadly they didn't pull it off with this one.
Mw, 01 Aug 2019Absolutely gorgeous pictures I miss my Nokia 1020There's another one coming 9.1 is killer
MOP737-iherb.com, 03 Jul 2019This must have the slowest camera introduced since the last PureView model by Nokia. All Nokia... moreSlowest to process because it processes much much much details than the rest of phones available and you can produce the best photo not any other phone available could match...
MOP737-iherb.com, 03 Jul 2019This must have the slowest camera introduced since the last PureView model by Nokia. All Nokia... moreSadly, all the Android One models are crap. Better to buy a Google Pixel or iPhone XS. https://www.android.com/one/
This must have the slowest camera introduced since the last PureView model by Nokia. All Nokia PureView models are slow.
And this doesn't even have zoom!
The only good thing about Nokia brand is that it contains almost pure Android, Android One.
sam, 17 Jun 2019people compare this phone with samsung S10 and others forgeting that it costs only £ 549... moreYou know that for a 1100 EUR you could instead have a quite nice second-hand car, right?
people compare this phone with samsung S10 and others forgeting that it costs only £ 549 and the others almost double!
I am hoping for Nokia 10 to come. I still like this phone because of 6 cameras
AnonD-860090, 08 Apr 2019I would like to appologise to all the persons who didn't understand my posts, and yes ? I shou... moreSo you are telling that Nokia 8 sirocco is better than the Nokia 9 in 2019? Then maybe you could be right!!!!
JuffeP, 22 May 2019False news. You should not believe everything you see in the internet. Internet is full of dis... moreIf that's the case, then shall I not believe the other failings of this device. Do not defend a company you like for doing something wrong
Lightning mcqueen, 22 May 2019Is the Nokia 8 sirocco now a better deal over Nokia 9? Pls let me know.I wouldn't say that. The Nokia feels superior to that underwhelming attempt
JuffeP, 22 May 2019Why speakers? This phone is about photos. Especially RAW photos. With sound I use external spe... moreThen you my friend either haven't heard a set of good speakers on a phone, or just have unrealistic standards for a phones speakers. And even if the phone is meant for photography, that beautiful display would've been perfect with speakers, especially with a lack of a headphone jack
Anonymous, 07 Apr 2019So you are comparing the Nokia 9 with old phones by several years/generations that doesn't hav... moreI think you should compare price level too. Many flagship models costs over 1000Â€s (at my local phonestore). So they should be much better, but most of them are not. Nokia 9 is 599Â€ camera here. So is Sony Xperia XZ2, Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 and Huawei P30. iPhone Xs (with 128MB) is 1500Â€, Huawei P30 Pro (128MB) is 849Â€, so why compare to them? I donÂ’t have opinion about iPhone or P30 Pro cameras, because I have kot teosten them, but Nokia 9 has marvellous camera. I donÂ’t belive that any other 599Â€ phone has so good camera. Or cameras I should say. But itÂ’s only belief. My newest phonecamera experience is from 2015.
So, I search my price level first, then I compare phones within that pricelevel. I came to conclusion that Nokia 9 is the best solution. I want to take good photos. For snappies I might use my old phone... if necessary.